强度(物理)
峰值地面加速度
流离失所(心理学)
加速度
双线性插值
航程(航空)
缩放比例
地震动
反应谱
强地震动
非线性系统
灵敏度(控制系统)
结构工程
数学
大地测量学
地质学
物理
工程类
统计
几何学
光学
心理学
经典力学
量子力学
航空航天工程
电子工程
心理治疗师
摘要
The characterization of strength of earthquake demands for seismic analysis or design requires the specification of a level of intensity. Numerous ground motion intensity indices that have been proposed over the years are being used for normalizing or scaling earthquake records regardless of their efficiency. An essential point of this study is that a ground motion index is appropriate, or efficient, as long as it can predict the level of structural response. This study presents correlations between 23 ground motion intensity indices and four response variables: elastic and inelastic deformation demands, and input energy and hysteretic energy; nonlinear responses are computed using elastoplastic, bilinear, and bilinear with stiffness degradation models. As expected, no index is found to be satisfactory over the entire frequency range. Indeed, indices related to ground acceleration rank better in the acceleration-sensitive region of the spectrum; indices based on ground velocity are better in the velocity-sensitive region and, correspondingly, generally occur in the displacement-controlled region. Despite frequent criticism, the peak ground motion parameters passed the test successfully. A ranking of indices is presented, thus providing a choice of the most appropriate one for a particular application in the frequency range of interest.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI