Intravenous versus Subcutaneous Drug Administration. Which Do Patients Prefer? A Systematic Review

医学 偏爱 患者满意度 交叉研究 随机对照试验 梅德林 临床试验 重症监护医学 替代医学 内科学 外科 政治学 法学 病理 经济 微观经济学 安慰剂
作者
Kelly L. Stoner,Helena Harder,Lesley Fallowfield,Valerie Jenkins
出处
期刊:The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research [Adis, Springer Healthcare]
卷期号:8 (2): 145-153 被引量:160
标识
DOI:10.1007/s40271-014-0075-y
摘要

Intravenous (IV) drug delivery is commonly used for its rapid administration and immediate drug effect. Most studies compare IV to subcutaneous (SC) delivery in terms of safety and efficacy, but little is known about what patients prefer. A systematic review was conducted by searching seven electronic databases for articles published up to February 2014. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and/or crossover designs investigating patient preference for SC versus IV administration. The risk of bias in the RCTs was determined using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. The search identified 115 publications, but few (6/115) met the inclusion criteria. Patient populations and drugs investigated were diverse. Four of six studies demonstrated a clear patient preference for SC administration. Main factors associated with SC preference were time saving and the ability to have treatment at home. Only three studies used study-specific instruments to measure preference. Results suggest that patients prefer SC over IV delivery. Patient preference has clearly been neglected in clinical research, but it is important in medical decision making when choosing treatment methods as it has implications for adherence and quality of life. If the safety and efficacy of both administration routes are equivalent, then the most important factor should be patient preference as this will ensure optimal treatment adherence and ultimately improve patient experience or satisfaction. Future drug efficacy and safety studies should include contemporaneous, actual patient preference where possible, utilizing appropriate measures.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
caicai完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
上官若男应助嘎嘎嘎嘎采纳,获得10
4秒前
负责八宝粥完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
止戈新新发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
羊羔蓉完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
mahuahua发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
酥酥完成签到 ,获得积分20
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
所所应助szyt4018采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
辛勤夜安发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Mstuzki完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
务实的夏菡完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
华仔应助彩色的电脑采纳,获得10
14秒前
田様应助心碎小漏采纳,获得10
15秒前
uuuu发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
sss发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
vae完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
丘比特应助齿瑛采纳,获得10
18秒前
稳重无招发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
威武忆山发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
壮观紫雪完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
踏实煎蛋完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
pbs发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
bobo发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
lieaait应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Organic Chemistry, 5th Edition 1000
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
日本現代怪異事典 副読本 700
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology 520
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7372949
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8980767
关于积分的说明 19093548
捐赠科研通 7014544
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3225390
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2388781
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2206012