Intrusive memories and voluntary memory of a trauma film: Differential effects of a cognitive interference task after encoding.

编码(内存) 任务(项目管理) 认知 差速器(机械装置) 干扰(通信) 认知心理学 干涉理论 心理学 微分效应 计算机科学 工作记忆 神经科学 医学 电信 工程类 航空航天工程 频道(广播) 内科学 系统工程
作者
Alex Lau‐Zhu,Richard N. Henson,Emily A. Holmes
出处
期刊:Journal of Experimental Psychology: General [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:148 (12): 2154-2180 被引量:35
标识
DOI:10.1037/xge0000598
摘要

Methods to reduce intrusive memories (e.g., of traumatic events) should ideally spare voluntary memory for the same event (e.g., to report on the event in court). Single-trace memory accounts assume that interfering with a trace should impact both its involuntary and voluntary expressions, whereas separate-trace accounts assume these two can dissociate, allowing for selective interference. This possibility was investigated in 3 experiments. Nonclinical participants viewed a trauma film followed by an interference task (Tetris game-play after reminder cues). Next, memory for the film was assessed with various measures. The interference task reduced the number of intrusive memories (diary-based, Experiments 1 and 2), but spared performance on well-matched measures of voluntary retrieval-free recall (Experiment 1) and recognition (Experiments 1 and 2)-challenging single-trace accounts. The interference task did not affect other measures of involuntary retrieval-perceptual priming (Experiment 1) or attentional bias (Experiment 2). However, the interference task did reduce the number of intrusive memories in a laboratory-based vigilance-intrusion task (Experiments 2 and 3), irrespective of concurrent working memory load during intrusion retrieval (Experiment 3). Collectively, results reveal a robust dissociation between intrusive and voluntary memories, having ruled out key methodological differences between how these two memory expressions are assessed, namely cue overlap (Experiment 1), attentional capture (Experiment 2), and retrieval load (Experiment 3). We argue that the inability of these retrieval factors to explain the selective interference is more compatible with separate-trace than single-trace accounts. Further theoretical developments are needed to account for this clinically important distinction between intrusive memories and their voluntary counterpart. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
波尔完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
无极微光应助CCC采纳,获得20
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
夏雨完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
共享精神应助Ttt采纳,获得10
3秒前
ggg完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
花佩剑发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
曲麟完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
xiaoni完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
脑洞疼应助鸭梨采纳,获得10
5秒前
蔡问钰完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
5秒前
漂亮忆灵完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
甜甜幻珊完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
lala发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
bbbin发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
Tranquil完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
0416发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
哈哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
Orange应助大橘为重采纳,获得10
10秒前
colleenld完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
斯文败类应助li采纳,获得10
12秒前
zhang发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
囧神完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
小蘑菇应助静静采纳,获得10
13秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
坦率紫菜发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
A Psychological Understanding of Criticism and Mental Health 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7751772
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9299101
关于积分的说明 20250333
捐赠科研通 7334116
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3310030
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2461480
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2322749