谈判
定量配给
构造(python库)
大都市区
计算机科学
运筹学
风险分析(工程)
经济
环境经济学
数学优化
业务
工程类
数学
程序设计语言
医学
医疗保健
病理
政治学
法学
经济增长
作者
Daniel Antônio Camelo Cid,Francisco de Assis de Souza Filho,Victor Costa Porto
标识
DOI:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001632
摘要
In situations of fluctuating water availability, the optimal reservoir operation policy, resulting from classical models, fails to be implemented for political reasons. This paper proposes a collaborative modeling approach to define the hedging rules of a two-basin reservoir system, in which the acceptable risks, rationing ratio, and reasonable transfer values are defined by the water allocation agents for different phases/drought states. An optimization algorithm is then applied to determine a politically viable hedging operation policy. The methodology showed good results for the Jaguaribe–Metropolitan system in Brazil, and the resulting policy could be applied to the real operation, as the simulated rationing frequencies were close to those defined by the managers’ consensus. The proposed methodology guarantees a politically viable alternative with conflict management possibilities. However, the performance of the resulting hedging rules depends on the negotiation capacity and tacit knowledge of the stakeholders. The proposed approach is a good alternative when the implementation of the mathematically optimum policy fails.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI