Positive obligations in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

作者
Laurens Lavrysen
出处
期刊:Ghent University - Ghent University Academic Bibliography 卷期号:7: 94-115 被引量:16
摘要

Th e present article examines the concept of positive obligations in the case law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (the Court). From its fi rst contentious case of Velasquez-Rodriguez v. Honduras on, the Court has clearly rejected the classical negativistic position that human rights only give rise to negative obligations to refrain from acting in such a way that violates human rights. Instead the Court has interpreted the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR) as also giving rise to positive obligations that require actions by the state to actively protect against human rights violations. Based on Articles 1(1) and 2 ACHR in conjunction with specifi c ACHR rights, the Court has recognised a wide array of positive obligations, including obligations to prevent, investigate, punish and provide reparations for human rights violations, as well as obligations to fulfi l human rights (in particular the right to a ‘dignifi ed’ life) and to provide substantive equality. Th e paper argues that the Court’s positive obligations case law clearly illustrates that the Court is acting at the forefront of developments in international human rights law. Moreover, it is argued that if the Court pursues the Drittwirkung approach proposed in its Advisory Opinion on the Juridical Condition and Rights of Undocumented Migrants, the ACHR has the potential of “constitutionalising” nearly all dimensions of human conduct. * Laurens Lavrysen is a Ph.D. Researcher at the Human Rights Centre of Ghent University. He works on a Ph.D. on Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. His research is funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) and takes place within the framework of the European Research Council funded project “Strengthening the European Court of Human Rights: More Accountability through Better Legal Reasoning”. . Positive Obligations in the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights Intersentia 95

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wu完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
花墨荷塘完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
墨月完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
wk有若发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
花墨荷塘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
lxx完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
renzhiai完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
8秒前
Tiger完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Spring完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
11秒前
科研通AI6.3应助白术采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
机灵书易发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
小小星辰发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
彦凝毓完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
MoChin完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
赵vv发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
Spring发布了新的文献求助50
19秒前
乐乐应助peng采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
ding应助牧紊采纳,获得10
20秒前
pokexuejiao发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
an发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
落霞发布了新的文献求助20
23秒前
这么年轻压根睡不着完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
25秒前
淇淇应助LuciusLLLX采纳,获得255
27秒前
29秒前
29秒前
djs完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 5000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Evidence Summary. Injection (subcutaneous):op- timal administration 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7494468
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9085858
关于积分的说明 19377892
捐赠科研通 7106325
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3249711
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2419139
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2235461