缺少数据
插补(统计学)
计算机科学
贝叶斯概率
主流
数据科学
计量经济学
人工智能
数学
机器学习
政治学
法学
作者
Joseph L. Schafer,John W. Graham
出处
期刊:Psychological Methods
[American Psychological Association]
日期:2002-01-01
卷期号:7 (2): 147-177
被引量:10361
标识
DOI:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147
摘要
Statistical procedures for missing data have vastly improved, yet misconception and unsound practice still abound. The authors frame the missing-data problem, review methods, offer advice, and raise issues that remain unresolved. They clear up common misunderstandings regarding the missing at random (MAR) concept. They summarize the evidence against older procedures and, with few exceptions, discourage their use. They present, in both technical and practical language, 2 general approaches that come highly recommended: maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian multiple imputation (MI). Newer developments are discussed, including some for dealing with missing data that are not MAR. Although not yet in the mainstream, these procedures may eventually extend the ML and MI methods that currently represent the state of the art.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI