Towards Clinical Integration of Deep Learning–Based Classification of Urinary Sediment Particles from Digital Microscopy Images: A Prospective Study

Abstract Background Urinalysis is a standard clinical test that includes the microscopic examination of urinary sediment to identify formed elements. Manual evaluation by laboratory technicians is time-intensive and subject to human error. Automated analysis using digital microscopy images presents a potential alternative. This study evaluates the integration of a deep learning approach to automatically classify urinary sediment images in the clinical laboratory, including independent prospective validation of its performance. Methods An annotated data set comprising 13 classes of urinary sediment elements was created from a database of Sysmex UD-10 digital microscope images. An EfficientNet-based model was trained and tested across three experimental scenarios to evaluate the effects of data collection strategies on performance. Uncertainty calibration was examined. The model’s robustness and interpretability were examined using gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) to visualize influential image regions and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) to analyze learned feature embeddings. Lastly, a graphical user interface was developed for a prospective evaluation in the laboratory. Results The model achieved approximately 97% overall accuracy on the test set. Experiments revealed sensitivity to data set variability, suggesting that performance may improve by integrating additional training examples. Confidence scores aligned with accuracy, and interpretability analyses showed that the model focused on relevant image regions and learned embeddings demonstrated clear class separation. In the prospective evaluation, top 1 and top 3 accuracies decreased to approximately 78% and 92%, respectively. Conclusions Our results indicate that a lightweight deep learning model can achieve high performance in classifying urine particles. Analysis of discrepancies between retrospective and prospective evaluations provides important insights toward reliable clinical application.