克朗巴赫阿尔法
指导
探索性因素分析
结构效度
任务(项目管理)
考试(生物学)
构造(python库)
临床实习
护理部
心理学
医学
医学教育
心理测量学
患者满意度
临床心理学
计算机科学
古生物学
管理
生物
经济
心理治疗师
程序设计语言
作者
Sonja Beckmann,Gabriela Schmid-Mohler,Marianne Müller,Elisabeth Spichiger,Dunja Nicca,Manuela Eicher,Andrea Ullmann-Bremi,Heidi Petry
摘要
To describe psychometric validation of the newly developed Advanced Practice Nurse Task Questionnaire.Cross-sectional quantitative study.The development of the questionnaire followed an adapted version of the seven steps described in the guide by the Association for Medical Education in Europe. A nationwide online survey tested the construct and structural validity and internal consistency using an exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and a Kruskal-Wallis test to compare the hypotheses.We received 222 questionnaires between January and September 2020. The factor analysis produced a seven-factor solution as suggested in Hamric's model. However, not all item loadings aligned with the framework's competencies. Cronbach's alpha of factors ranged between .795 and .879. The analysis confirmed the construct validity of the Advanced Practice Nurse Task Questionnaire. The tool was able to discriminate the competencies of guidance and coaching, direct clinical practice and leadership across the three advanced practice nurse roles clinical nurse specialist, nurse practitioner or blended role.A precise assessment of advanced practice nurse tasks is crucial in clinical practice and in research as it may be a basis for further refinement, implementation and evaluation of roles.The Advanced Practice Nurse Task Questionnaire is the first valid tool to assess tasks according to Hamric's model of competencies independently of the role or the setting. Additionally, it distinguishes the most common advanced practice nurse roles according to the degree of tasks in direct clinical practice and leadership. The tool may be applied in various countries, independent of the degree of implementation and understanding of advanced nursing practice.The STARD 2015 guideline was used to report the study.No patient or public contribution.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI