(139) What Penis Size and Glans-shape do Cis and Trans Men and Women Prefer?

阴茎成形术 龟头 阴茎头 理想(伦理) 阴茎 医学 变性人 心理学 外科 哲学 认识论 精神分析
作者
Sunmeet Sandhu,Peris Castaneda,S Mallavarapu,J Stelmar,S Smith,M Garcia
出处
期刊:The Journal of Sexual Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:21 (Supplement_1)
标识
DOI:10.1093/jsxmed/qdae001.133
摘要

Abstract Introduction The ideal length, circumference, and appearance of the penis are important to the self-confidence and body image of most men. To date, only 2 works have assessed preferred erect (but not flaccid) penis length, and only among cis-gender women. No study has evaluated preferred aesthetics--ideal erect and flaccid penile length, or, glans-shape and size preferences among cis-gender and transgender and non-binary individuals. These preference domains are especially important with genital gender-affirming surgery (gGAS) because length and glans-shape are entirely elective and technique-based, and help define neophallus appearance. Lastly, outlining the planned glans shape on a neophallus can be technically challenging, and, to date no publications have reported offering trans men input/choices. Objective 1) To query ideal for flaccid and erect penis length across all individuals, across cis- and transgender identities; 2) Determine specific likes/dislikes among all subjects for 7 different glans-shape examples; and 3) Among men undergoing phalloplasty, creation of glans-shape stencils for use in the OR, as a means to offer patients choice, and, to ensure that the final product aligns with patient’s choice. Methods An anonymous, online survey (QualtricsTM) evaluated glans preferences among 7 realistic prosthetic penis models shown. Participants were queried about their age, sex, gender, sexual orientation, and their ideal flaccid and erect penis length. Stencils were created based on 6 penis models. Subsequently, 7 transmen-subjects were able to choose the most-preferred glans shape and the stencil was applied before glansplasty surgery (Figure 1). Glansplasty results were assessed 12-weeks post-operatively (Figure 1c; E-F). Results 74 participants took the survey, (mean age of 35.3, Range: 23–59). 43/74 (58%) self-identified as men, and 28/74 (38%) identified as men, including 7 trans men (Table 1a). Men reported a mean ideal flaccid and erect length of 4.5 and 6.3-inches, respectively, while women reported a length of 5.2 inches and 6.16-inches, respectively. Women had a wider range of responses for both ideal flaccid and erect penile length (p>0.05) (Table 1b). For glans-shape preference, across all groups (independent of sex or sexuality), the “most-liked” options were A and E, and “most-disliked” were B and D (Figure 2). Among the 7 transmen undergoing glansplasty, 5/7 (71%) chose glans-shape C, and 1/7 (14%) each chose glans-shapes A and E, for their own phallus. Conclusions This is the first study to survey both men and women regarding ideal erect penile length, and the first regarding ideal flaccid penile length and glans-shape preferences. Our data suggests that the ideal erect and flaccid length are longer (within 2SD) than the mean values for cis-men of 5.16-inches and 3.61-inches respectively, (Miles et al., BJUI, 2014) but there is greater variability among women’s responses. Regarding glans-shape, most preferred a more tapered, bullet-like tip for the distal glans and a less prominent glans ridge. Finally, our glansplasty stencils are easy to use, yield excellent aesthetic results, and the option to choose their own glans shape is highly appreciated by patients. Disclosure No.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
一页书完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
泡泡完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Binbin完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Vicky完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
4秒前
DrYang发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Rosalind完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
xiaojie2024完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
核桃发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
WZH完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
梁燕回发布了新的文献求助50
7秒前
wnan_07完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
伊丽莎白居易完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
OYZY完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
WNB完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
科研通AI5应助小东同志采纳,获得30
11秒前
hzj完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
zhang发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
17秒前
19秒前
调皮雨莲完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
23秒前
深情安青应助天真无招采纳,获得10
23秒前
涵昱春风发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
CodeCraft应助zhang采纳,获得10
24秒前
天空不空完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
乐乐应助研友_ZG4ml8采纳,获得10
24秒前
卿久久完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
doa完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
李开明完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
慕青应助鲁西西采纳,获得10
25秒前
爆米花应助DrYang采纳,获得10
25秒前
不安溪灵发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
27秒前
调皮雨莲关注了科研通微信公众号
27秒前
陶醉的念之完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
高分求助中
(禁止应助)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Madrid Code) (Regnum Vegetabile) 1500
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 820
Византийско-аланские отно- шения (VI–XII вв.) 500
Improvement of Fingering-Induced Pattern Collapse by Adjusting Chemical Mixing Procedure 500
The Netter Collection of Medical Illustrations: Digestive System, Volume 9, Part III – Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas, 3rd Edition 400
Elliptical Fiber Waveguides 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4179876
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3715302
关于积分的说明 11712847
捐赠科研通 3396159
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1863330
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 921625
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 833344