医学
芬太尼
镇静
异丙酚
咪唑安定
麻醉
养生
电话采访
认知
抽搐
心理干预
外科
精神科
社会科学
社会学
作者
Tobie J Watkins,Raymond Bonds,Kedrin Hodges,Brooks B Goettle,Donald Dobson,John Maye
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2014-04-01
卷期号:82 (2): 133-9
被引量:23
摘要
The primary purpose of this investigation was to evaluate postprocedure cognitive function associated with 3 distinct standard sedation regimens used for endoscopic procedures. A secondary aim was to identify complications requiring provider interventions. Subjects scheduled for colonoscopies were approached for enrollment the day of their procedure. A convenience sample of 96 subjects was randomly assigned. Cognitive function was recorded on the day of surgery using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and 24 and 48 hours postoperatively using the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS). The propofol plus fentanyl group had a mean TICS score of 34.53 at 24 hours compared with 34.96 at 48 hours (P = .017). The midazolam plus fentanyl group had a mean TICS score of 34.76 at 24 hours compared with 36.26 at 48 hours (P = .004). The propofol-alone group had a mean TICS score of 35.09 at 24 hours compared with 35.98 at 48 hours (P = .924). The results of this investigation indicate that the sedation regimen of propofol alone has the least impact on postprocedure cognitive function. Additionally, the number of jaw lift interventions was significantly higher in both groups who received fentanyl.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI