材料科学
断裂韧性
裂纹扩展阻力曲线
紧凑拉伸试样
断裂(地质)
复合材料
断裂力学
裂纹尖端张开位移
流离失所(心理学)
变形(气象学)
试验方法
裂缝闭合
结构工程
平面应力
法律工程学
可塑性
试验数据
平面(几何)
韧性
拉伸试验
延展性(地球科学)
开裂
张力(地质)
电流(流体)
摘要
Abstract The Direct Current Electrical Potential Difference (DCEPD) technique has been used for many years in fatigue and fracture testing for monitoring crack propagation in metallic materials. The principle of DCEPD methods is that when a constant current flows through a cracked specimen, the voltage change measured across the crack plane can be analytically related, empirically related, or both, to the change in crack size. In fatigue testing, performed within the limits of Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics, crack propagation is the sole source of potential change. In ductile fracture testing, additional contributions from specimen dimension changes and crack-tip plastic deformation (blunting) have to be accounted for and distinguished from the DCEPD increase caused by crack growth. The ASTM E08.07.09 Task Group, formed in 2013 and chaired by the author, has been developing an annex for ASTM E1820, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness, which focuses on the use of DCEPD measurements for the prediction of crack size and crack extension in ductile fracture toughness tests. This article presents the analysis of an analytical round-robin, in which 8 participants analyzed 24 existing fracture toughness data sets using two different approaches, based on the analysis of the displacement versus DCEPD and force versus DCEPD, respectively. The comparison between these two approaches and the implications for the ASTM E1820 annex being developed are the focus of this article.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI