The Effect of Early Fluid Resuscitation on Mortality in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

医学 复苏 荟萃分析 败血症 重症监护医学 急诊医学 内科学
作者
Michael Ward,Hani I. Kuttab,Robert G. Badgett
出处
期刊:Critical Care Medicine [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
标识
DOI:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006769
摘要

While general agreement exists on many sepsis management principles, the details of early fluid resuscitation in sepsis remain contentious. The aim of the current review is to examine the impact of early (≤ 8 hr) fluid dosing, timing, and guideline-based resuscitation on mortality in sepsis. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from January 1, 2000, to November 8, 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational data, adjusting for confounding, for adults (≥ 18 yr) with sepsis. From 2,169 citations, 30 studies with 119,583 patients were included. Dosing: three randomized trials suggest no mortality difference between more liberal (~43-72 mL/kg) vs. more restrictive (as low as 30 mL/kg) fluid resuscitative strategies (relative risk, 1.00 [0.81-1.24]). Eleven of 13 studies observed mortality risk when low-fluid volumes were administered (< 20 mL/kg; effect direction/sign test: p < 0.001). Six of 11 studies observed mortality risk when fluid volume dosing exceeded higher limits (> 45 mL/kg; p = 0.55). Timing: four of four studies observed a survival benefit with earlier completion of 30 mL/kg (within 3 hr; p = 0.12). Thirty mL/kg by discrete time: less than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to 2 hours-two studies observed survival benefit; less than or equal to 3 hours-one study observed survival benefit and three studies observed no mortality impact; and less than or equal to 6 hours-two studies observed a survival benefit, four studies observed no impact, and two studies observed increased mortality risk (both > 30 groups received > 50 and > 70 mL/kg). For fluid resuscitation within 8 hours of sepsis diagnosis: 1) randomized trials suggest no mortality difference between more restrictive and more liberal fluid resuscitative strategies (certainty of evidence: low); 2) dosing less than 20 mL/kg has an effect on increased mortality (low certainty); 3) observational studies trend toward increased mortality with higher volume resuscitation (> 45 mL/kg) but are not supported by randomized trials (very low certainty); and 4) survival benefit is observed when 30 mL/kg is completed within 3 hours (low certainty).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
内秀完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
Su发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
深情安青应助yy采纳,获得10
2秒前
张7发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
qh发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
xubee发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
领导范儿应助陈小露采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
Eternity2025应助雨荷采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
芳芳发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
赵锐完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
天天快乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得200
4秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
小杭76应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
5秒前
高分求助中
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Third edition 2025 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Beyond the sentence : discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5338621
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4475739
关于积分的说明 13929215
捐赠科研通 4370994
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2401582
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1394626
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1366445