有可能
独创性
转化式学习
共同创造
价值(数学)
业务
供应链
知识管理
竞争优势
规范性
营销
面试
社会学
心理学
计算机科学
定性研究
政治学
机器学习
人类学
法学
心理治疗师
社会科学
教育学
作者
Stanley E. Fawcett,Amydee M. Fawcett,A. Michael Knemeyer,Sebastian Brockhaus,G. Scott Webb
标识
DOI:10.1108/ijpdlm-12-2020-0390
摘要
Purpose Despite over 30 years of focus on supply chain collaboration, companies continue to struggle to achieve collaborative advantage. To better understand why some companies are able to collaborate for competitive advantage and others can't, the authors explore how managerial commitment enables collaborative capabilities. Design/methodology/approach The authors employed a longitudinal inductive study, interviewing companies with reputations for intense supply chain collaboration at four different times over 20 years. Findings The authors identified managerial commitment as a super-ordinate enabler. They describe the dynamics of commitment development and explore three types of commitment: instrumental, normative and transformative. The authors document key antecedents and outcomes of each type of commitment. Research limitations/implications Theory regarding the antecedents to commitment to collaborative capability is underdeveloped. The authors elaborate these antecedents and the dynamics that enable or undermine the commitment necessary to build effective collaboration capabilities. Practical implications The authors provide insight (i.e. a practical and actionable roadmap) into the process companies use to cultivate commitment to collaboration and value co-creation. Originality/value Collaboration is critical to value co-creation, including effective supply chain risk mitigation and lasting sustainability efforts. The authors elaborate a theory of commitment dynamics that explains why most companies never go beyond basic levels of collaboration. At the same time, the authors provide a roadmap for deep, transformative collaboration.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI