亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Systematic review of the potential adverse effects of caffeine consumption in healthy adults, pregnant women, adolescents, and children

医学 咖啡因 人口 不利影响 同行评审 环境卫生 人口学 老年学 精神科 内科学 政治学 社会学 法学
作者
Daniele Wikoff,Brian T. Welsh,Rayetta G. Henderson,Gregory P. Brorby,Janice K. Britt,Esther F. Myers,Jeffrey J. Goldberger,Harris R. Lieberman,Charles P. O’Brien,Jennifer D. Peck,Milton Tenenbein,Connie M. Weaver,Seneca Harvey,Jonathan D. Urban,Candace Doepker
出处
期刊:Food and Chemical Toxicology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:109: 585-648 被引量:354
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2017.04.002
摘要

To date, one of the most heavily cited assessments of caffeine safety in the peer-reviewed literature is that issued by Health Canada (Nawrot et al., 2003). Since then, >10,000 papers have been published related to caffeine, including hundreds of reviews on specific human health effects; however, to date, none have compared the wide range of topics evaluated by Nawrot et al. (2003). Thus, as an update to this foundational publication, we conducted a systematic review of data on potential adverse effects of caffeine published from 2001 to June 2015. Subject matter experts and research team participants developed five PECO (population, exposure, comparator, and outcome) questions to address five types of outcomes (acute toxicity, cardiovascular toxicity, bone and calcium effects, behavior, and development and reproduction) in four healthy populations (adults, pregnant women, adolescents, and children) relative to caffeine intake doses determined not to be associated with adverse effects by Health Canada (comparators: 400 mg/day for adults [10 g for lethality], 300 mg/day for pregnant women, and 2.5 mg/kg/day for children and adolescents). The a priori search strategy identified >5000 articles that were screened, with 381 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria for the five outcomes (pharmacokinetics was addressed contextually, adding 46 more studies). Data were extracted by the research team and rated for risk of bias and indirectness (internal and external validity). Selected no- and low-effect intakes were assessed relative to the population-specific comparator. Conclusions were drawn for the body of evidence for each outcome, as well as endpoints within an outcome, using a weight of evidence approach. When the total body of evidence was evaluated and when study quality, consistency, level of adversity, and magnitude of response were considered, the evidence generally supports that consumption of up to 400 mg caffeine/day in healthy adults is not associated with overt, adverse cardiovascular effects, behavioral effects, reproductive and developmental effects, acute effects, or bone status. Evidence also supports consumption of up to 300 mg caffeine/day in healthy pregnant women as an intake that is generally not associated with adverse reproductive and developmental effects. Limited data were identified for child and adolescent populations; the available evidence suggests that 2.5 mg caffeine/kg body weight/day remains an appropriate recommendation. The results of this systematic review support a shift in caffeine research to focus on characterizing effects in sensitive populations and establishing better quantitative characterization of interindividual variability (e.g., epigenetic trends), subpopulations (e.g., unhealthy populations, individuals with preexisting conditions), conditions (e.g., coexposures), and outcomes (e.g., exacerbation of risk-taking behavior) that could render individuals to be at greater risk relative to healthy adults and healthy pregnant women. This review, being one of the first to apply systematic review methodologies to toxicological assessments, also highlights the need for refined guidance and frameworks unique to the conduct of systematic review in this field.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
苶凉完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
77完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
4秒前
研友_zndKVL完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
广州小肥羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
开放紫南发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
chenhui完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
Tyh完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
张晓芮完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
jiayueW发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
火星上的芫完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
啊啊啊啊啊啊啊完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
23秒前
贺安完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
giuer完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
ban发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
煮个鸭梨吃吃完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
Aaiz完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
Ahui完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
longh完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
亦周完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
39秒前
Page_Page完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
fuzhy发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
尘香如故完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
Hasson完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
54秒前
科研通AI6.4应助fuzhy采纳,获得10
57秒前
青梅煮酒发布了新的文献求助20
1分钟前
stresm完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
Yaojun发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
阔口阔落发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
ban发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Geist der Kunst und Kultur 1000
Resistance Spot Welding Dataset for Automobile Body-in-White Quality Analysis 748
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
丝光沸石活性位点定向调控及其二甲醚羰基化性能研究 500
Elgar Concise Encyclopedia of Research Methods in the Social Sciences 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7416384
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9019781
关于积分的说明 19215063
捐赠科研通 7047370
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3234266
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2396836
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2216506