Systematic review of the potential adverse effects of caffeine consumption in healthy adults, pregnant women, adolescents, and children

医学 咖啡因 人口 不利影响 同行评审 环境卫生 人口学 老年学 精神科 内科学 政治学 社会学 法学
作者
Daniele Wikoff,Brian T. Welsh,Rayetta G. Henderson,Gregory P. Brorby,Janice K. Britt,Esther F. Myers,Jeffrey J. Goldberger,Harris R. Lieberman,Charles P. O’Brien,Jennifer D. Peck,Milton Tenenbein,Connie M. Weaver,Seneca Harvey,Jonathan D. Urban,Candace Doepker
出处
期刊:Food and Chemical Toxicology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:109: 585-648 被引量:354
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2017.04.002
摘要

To date, one of the most heavily cited assessments of caffeine safety in the peer-reviewed literature is that issued by Health Canada (Nawrot et al., 2003). Since then, >10,000 papers have been published related to caffeine, including hundreds of reviews on specific human health effects; however, to date, none have compared the wide range of topics evaluated by Nawrot et al. (2003). Thus, as an update to this foundational publication, we conducted a systematic review of data on potential adverse effects of caffeine published from 2001 to June 2015. Subject matter experts and research team participants developed five PECO (population, exposure, comparator, and outcome) questions to address five types of outcomes (acute toxicity, cardiovascular toxicity, bone and calcium effects, behavior, and development and reproduction) in four healthy populations (adults, pregnant women, adolescents, and children) relative to caffeine intake doses determined not to be associated with adverse effects by Health Canada (comparators: 400 mg/day for adults [10 g for lethality], 300 mg/day for pregnant women, and 2.5 mg/kg/day for children and adolescents). The a priori search strategy identified >5000 articles that were screened, with 381 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria for the five outcomes (pharmacokinetics was addressed contextually, adding 46 more studies). Data were extracted by the research team and rated for risk of bias and indirectness (internal and external validity). Selected no- and low-effect intakes were assessed relative to the population-specific comparator. Conclusions were drawn for the body of evidence for each outcome, as well as endpoints within an outcome, using a weight of evidence approach. When the total body of evidence was evaluated and when study quality, consistency, level of adversity, and magnitude of response were considered, the evidence generally supports that consumption of up to 400 mg caffeine/day in healthy adults is not associated with overt, adverse cardiovascular effects, behavioral effects, reproductive and developmental effects, acute effects, or bone status. Evidence also supports consumption of up to 300 mg caffeine/day in healthy pregnant women as an intake that is generally not associated with adverse reproductive and developmental effects. Limited data were identified for child and adolescent populations; the available evidence suggests that 2.5 mg caffeine/kg body weight/day remains an appropriate recommendation. The results of this systematic review support a shift in caffeine research to focus on characterizing effects in sensitive populations and establishing better quantitative characterization of interindividual variability (e.g., epigenetic trends), subpopulations (e.g., unhealthy populations, individuals with preexisting conditions), conditions (e.g., coexposures), and outcomes (e.g., exacerbation of risk-taking behavior) that could render individuals to be at greater risk relative to healthy adults and healthy pregnant women. This review, being one of the first to apply systematic review methodologies to toxicological assessments, also highlights the need for refined guidance and frameworks unique to the conduct of systematic review in this field.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
王能能发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
上官若男应助JoeC采纳,获得10
6秒前
科研牛马人完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
桐桐应助豆沙卷采纳,获得10
8秒前
Jasper应助豆小豆采纳,获得10
8秒前
ccc完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
爆米花应助小颜采纳,获得10
10秒前
Bookshake完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
LYL完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Yuan应助jjn采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
DAJI完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
18秒前
20秒前
ahxb完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
王能能发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
23秒前
23秒前
27秒前
含糊的茹妖完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
宅宅完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
JoeC发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
JoeC完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
HuanchuWang完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
41秒前
43秒前
852应助南江悍匪采纳,获得10
44秒前
勤劳的芸发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
48秒前
daytoy发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
49秒前
白蒲桃完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
王能能完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
53秒前
53秒前
54秒前
55秒前
南江悍匪发布了新的文献求助10
55秒前
高分求助中
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 2500
The Mother of All Tableaux Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 1370
Future Approaches to Electrochemical Sensing of Neurotransmitters 1000
生物降解型栓塞微球市场(按产品类型、应用和最终用户)- 2030 年全球预测 1000
壮语核心名词的语言地图及解释 900
Digital predistortion of memory polynomial systems using direct and indirect learning architectures 500
Theories of Human Development 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 计算机科学 纳米技术 复合材料 化学工程 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 光电子学 量子力学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3917337
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3462877
关于积分的说明 10926004
捐赠科研通 3190535
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1763419
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 853577
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 793955