Systematic review of the potential adverse effects of caffeine consumption in healthy adults, pregnant women, adolescents, and children

医学 咖啡因 人口 不利影响 同行评审 环境卫生 人口学 老年学 精神科 内科学 政治学 社会学 法学
作者
Daniele Wikoff,Brian T. Welsh,Rayetta G. Henderson,Gregory P. Brorby,Janice K. Britt,Esther F. Myers,Jeffrey J. Goldberger,Harris R. Lieberman,Charles P. O’Brien,Jennifer D. Peck,Milton Tenenbein,Connie M. Weaver,Seneca Harvey,Jonathan D. Urban,Candace Doepker
出处
期刊:Food and Chemical Toxicology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:109: 585-648 被引量:354
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2017.04.002
摘要

To date, one of the most heavily cited assessments of caffeine safety in the peer-reviewed literature is that issued by Health Canada (Nawrot et al., 2003). Since then, >10,000 papers have been published related to caffeine, including hundreds of reviews on specific human health effects; however, to date, none have compared the wide range of topics evaluated by Nawrot et al. (2003). Thus, as an update to this foundational publication, we conducted a systematic review of data on potential adverse effects of caffeine published from 2001 to June 2015. Subject matter experts and research team participants developed five PECO (population, exposure, comparator, and outcome) questions to address five types of outcomes (acute toxicity, cardiovascular toxicity, bone and calcium effects, behavior, and development and reproduction) in four healthy populations (adults, pregnant women, adolescents, and children) relative to caffeine intake doses determined not to be associated with adverse effects by Health Canada (comparators: 400 mg/day for adults [10 g for lethality], 300 mg/day for pregnant women, and 2.5 mg/kg/day for children and adolescents). The a priori search strategy identified >5000 articles that were screened, with 381 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria for the five outcomes (pharmacokinetics was addressed contextually, adding 46 more studies). Data were extracted by the research team and rated for risk of bias and indirectness (internal and external validity). Selected no- and low-effect intakes were assessed relative to the population-specific comparator. Conclusions were drawn for the body of evidence for each outcome, as well as endpoints within an outcome, using a weight of evidence approach. When the total body of evidence was evaluated and when study quality, consistency, level of adversity, and magnitude of response were considered, the evidence generally supports that consumption of up to 400 mg caffeine/day in healthy adults is not associated with overt, adverse cardiovascular effects, behavioral effects, reproductive and developmental effects, acute effects, or bone status. Evidence also supports consumption of up to 300 mg caffeine/day in healthy pregnant women as an intake that is generally not associated with adverse reproductive and developmental effects. Limited data were identified for child and adolescent populations; the available evidence suggests that 2.5 mg caffeine/kg body weight/day remains an appropriate recommendation. The results of this systematic review support a shift in caffeine research to focus on characterizing effects in sensitive populations and establishing better quantitative characterization of interindividual variability (e.g., epigenetic trends), subpopulations (e.g., unhealthy populations, individuals with preexisting conditions), conditions (e.g., coexposures), and outcomes (e.g., exacerbation of risk-taking behavior) that could render individuals to be at greater risk relative to healthy adults and healthy pregnant women. This review, being one of the first to apply systematic review methodologies to toxicological assessments, also highlights the need for refined guidance and frameworks unique to the conduct of systematic review in this field.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
2秒前
2秒前
淡然妙松完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
脑洞疼应助呼呼采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
ZZXX完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
5秒前
6秒前
ding应助冯小路采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
giao完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
羟丙甲基纤维素完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
lili发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
dhdx完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
田様应助坦率的嫣娆采纳,获得50
8秒前
完美世界应助wxt采纳,获得10
8秒前
完美世界应助滚滚采纳,获得20
8秒前
giao发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
felix发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
许愿星发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
大白完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
wanci应助mader采纳,获得10
11秒前
李爱国应助lili采纳,获得10
11秒前
体贴香岚完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
共享精神应助Zhang采纳,获得10
12秒前
科目三应助小绵羊采纳,获得10
13秒前
酷波er应助Natureone采纳,获得10
13秒前
852应助优秀冰棍采纳,获得20
13秒前
思源应助练得身形似鹤形采纳,获得10
13秒前
兴奋发卡发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
peng发布了新的文献求助30
15秒前
orixero应助felix采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
核安全综合知识2024版 500
Photothermal Science and Techniques 500
Digital Displacement Hydrostatic Transmission for Rotorcraft and Distributed Propulsion 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7704885
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9262771
关于积分的说明 20039768
捐赠科研通 7280645
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3295063
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2450223
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2301872