Morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of the molecular subtypes of urothelial carcinomas

The molecular subtypes of urothelial carcinoma in each classification scheme have characteristic immunohistochemical features. At the same time, the results of conducted studies often demonstrate a discrepancy between the genomic profile of urothelial carcinoma and its immunophenotype, which complicates the immunohistochemical verification of the molecular subtypes of these tumors. Objective To compare the morphological and immunophenotypic characteristics of the molecular subtypes of urothelial carcinoma. Material and methods Surgical specimens from 196 patients diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis and bladder were investigated. Paraffin-embedded sections were immunohistochemically examined using the standard protocol. Antibodies against CK5/6, CK17, Rb1 (Dako), CK14, CK18, CK20, Cyclin D1, Cyclin E1, Cyclin A, Cyclin B, Chromogranin, E-Cadherin, P-Cadherin, p16, Uroplakin II, TUBB2B, Vimentin, ZEB-2 ('Novocastra'), CD44, GATA-3, and Uroplakin III ('Cell Marque') were used. Results Out of 68 (35%) superficial papillary urothelial carcinomas, 24 (12%) tumors constituted Molecular Class I and 12 (6%) and 32 (16%) ones did Molecular Classes II and III, respectively. Of the 128 (65%) muscle-invasive urothelial carcinomas, 57 (29%) tumors were referred to as the luminal-papillary molecular subtype, and 24 (12%) and 14 (7%) were as the luminal-infiltrated and luminal molecular subtypes, respectively. The basal squamous molecular subtype was verified in 31 (16%) neoplasms and the neuronal phenotype was detected in 2 (1%) cases. Conclusion Most pT1 tissues correspond to Molecular Class II. In the muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma group, the neoplasms with a luminal phenotype predominate over the tumors with basal and neuronal phenotypes.