Interdigital vs Transarticular Lateral Release With Scarf Osteotomy

We compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the interdigital approach vs the medial transarticular approach for lateral release combined with scarf osteotomy.Seventy-seven feet with moderate to severe hallux valgus underwent scarf osteotomy and lateral soft tissue release, using an interdigital approach (n = 36) vs medial transarticular approach (n = 41). The clinical measurements (range of motion, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society [AOFAS] score) and radiographic data were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up (93-124 months postoperatively). Additionally, the numeric pain rating scale and Foot and Ankle Outcome score [FAOS] were assessed postoperatively.The AOFAS score improved from 60 (q1 = 54, q3 = 70) to 93 (q1 = 85, q3 = 98) in the transarticular group, and from 59 (q1 = 50, q3 = 64) to 95 (q1 = 85, q3 = 100) in the interdigital group. The hallux valgus angle improved from 35.7±6.5 degrees to 15.5±7.6 degrees in the transarticular group, and from 36.0±6.8 degrees to 12.9±13.0 degrees in the interdigital group. The intermetatarsal angle improved from 16.5±2.5 degrees to 6.5±2.7 degrees within the transarticular group and from 17.2±2.5 degrees to 7.3±4.3 degrees in the interdigital group. None of the clinical or radiographic parameters showed any significant differences between the treatment groups.Comparison of outcomes between the interdigital approach and the transarticular approach for lateral soft-tissue release with scarf osteotomy are equally successful. The transarticular approach can thus be considered safe and effective, with the additional benefits of just one scar as opposed to 2.Level III, therapeutic.