Dienogest vs GnRH agonists as postoperative therapy after laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel and parametrial surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The recurrence of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) after its surgical excision is a big problem: postoperative treatment is crucial. OBJECTIVE: To compare two postoperative treatments: Dienogest and GnRH agonists. DESIGN: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). PATIENTS: 146 women submitted to laparoscopic eradication of DIE with bowel and parametrial surgery. INTERVENTIONS: = 65) received Dienogest 2 mg/day for at least 6 months. A first interview made after six months valued compliance to therapy, treatment tolerability, pain improvement, and side effects. A second interview at 30 ± 6 months valued pain relapse, imaging relapse, and pregnancy rate. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Dienogest about the reduction in pain recurrence. Secondary outcomes were differences in terms of treatment tolerability, side effects, imaging relapse rate, and pregnancy rate. RESULTS: = .026). No difference in terms of clinical relapse, imaging relapse, and live births was found. CONCLUSIONS: Dienogest has proven to be as effective as GnRH agonists in preventing recurrence of DIE and associated pelvic pain after surgery. Also, it is better tolerated by patients.