静脉穿刺
医学
致盲
焦虑
荟萃分析
随机对照试验
分散注意力
严格标准化平均差
安慰剂
疼痛评估
科克伦图书馆
物理疗法
系统回顾
梅德林
疼痛管理
麻醉
外科
内科学
心理学
替代医学
精神科
神经科学
病理
法学
政治学
作者
Faizan Niaz,Samiuddin Tariq,Anjum Mohyuddin Ahmed,Yusra Afzal,Taha Gul Shaikh,Abdulqadir J. Nashwan,Irfan Ullah
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gpeds.2023.100060
摘要
Virtual Reality immersion is a more recent form of distraction that may have been used in the pediatric setting for reducing pain and fear in children undergoing needle-based intravenous procedures. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the efficacy of Virtual Reality compared to non-pharmacological standard care in reducing periprocedural pain and anxiety. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar were searched from inception till March 5, 2023. Data was extracted by two reviewers and independently verified. The primary outcomes were patient-reported pain and fear using numerically graded scales. A total of 11 randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of VR with any form of non-pharmacological methods of pain and anxiety relief in children ≤ 12 years old were included. While the risk of bias across the studies was moderate, there was a high risk of bias regarding blinding of personnel and outcome assessment. A few studies also showed moderate attrition bias and the same in allocation concealment. VR reduced patient-reported pain (SMD = -1.55, 95% CI = -2.11 to -0.98, P<0.00001, I2 = 95%) and fear (SMD = -1.19, 95% CI = -1.64 to -0.74, P < 0.00001, I2 = 90%). This was consistent in our analysis of sub-groups, such as phlebotomy-associated pain (SMD = -1.84, 95% CI = -2.52 to -1.16, P<0.00001) and fear (SMD = -1.42, 95% CI = -1.86 to -0.97, P < 0.00001, I2 = 85%). Evidence suggests VR may be more effective than traditional non-pharmacological pain and fear relief. This result seems to be consistent through different procedures. More rigorous studies are required under standardized conditions to truly gauge the effect of VR.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI