已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Development and validation of a new ataxia rating scale: Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)

作者
Tanja Schmitz‐Hübsch,Sophie Tézenas du Montcel,László Balikó,José Berciano,Sylvia Boesch,Alexandra Dürr,Paola Giunti,Jian‐Sheng Kang,Caterina Mariotti,Massimo Pandolfo,Maria J. Rakowicz,Ludger J. Schöls,Sandra Szymanski,Bart P.C. van de Warrenburg,Thomas Klockgether
出处
期刊:Aktuelle Neurologie [Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)]
卷期号:32 (S 4) 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1055/s-2005-919541
摘要

Validated instruments for standardized graded assessment of symptom severity are essential prerequisites for clinical trials. To date, such instruments are lacking for cerebellar ataxia. Although ataxia rating scales have been published, they have not been sufficiently validated. We therefore developed a new scale named Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) that allows a graded assessment of ataxia symptoms on an impairment level. Items were chosen for their specificity for cerebellar involvement and the possibility for standardized performance and rating. To determine essential biometric properties two multicentric validation trials involving 11 centers from 8 European countries were performed in 167 and 119 spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) patients, respectively. SARA is composed of 8 items including gait, stance, sitting, speech, finger chase, finger-nose test, fast alternating hand movements and heel-shin slide with a sum score range of 0–40 (0=no ataxia, 40=severe ataxia). The scale is supplemented by an Inventory of Non-Ataxia Symptoms (INAS) aiming at a standardized full clinical description of symptoms in SCA patients. The first validation trial allowed to determine objectivity and practicability, as well as reliability (internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability) and validity (concurrent validity, comparison with convergent criterion). Results showed sufficient practicability with a mean performance time of 17min. Factorial analysis showed that all items except one were determined by a single factor. Internal consistency was good with Cronbach's alpha 0,90. Inter-rater reliability was very good for the sum score (0.97) but only limited (0.7) for finger-nose test. Mean sum score increased with higher ataxia disability stages. However, data were insufficient to show linearity of the scale due to bias towards less severely affected patients. Unexpectedly, side differences were reported in 33.5% of items measuring limb ataxia. According to these results, a modified scale underwent a second validation trial. The study was performed within the European integrated project on spinocerebellar ataxias (EUROSCA), funded by the European commission. Contributing clinical centers were: Bochum (D), Bonn (D), Brussels (B), Frankfurt a.M. (D), Innsbruck (A), London (UK), Milano (I), Nijmegen (NL), Paris (F), Pecs (H), Santander (E),Tübingen (D), Warsaw (PL).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lishuang发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
MaFY发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
t妥妥滴发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
述词完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
123完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
ol关注了科研通微信公众号
6秒前
qwert118的应助被单薄丹翠采纳,获得10
6秒前
豆豆完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
nav完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
吉如天完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
朴实的成风完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
顺心尔冬完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
JamesPei的应助被轻松背包采纳,获得10
11秒前
北望发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
null的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
酷波er的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
嘻嘻哈哈的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
嘻嘻哈哈的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
null的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得80
17秒前
小蘑菇的应助被优质羊肉泡馍采纳,获得10
17秒前
所所的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
慕青的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
19秒前
研友_VZG7GZ的应助被小马采纳,获得10
19秒前
Jasper的应助被chilly27采纳,获得10
21秒前
25秒前
拟态橙完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被富富裕采纳,获得10
25秒前
Hello的应助被哈哈采纳,获得10
26秒前
平淡的夜柳完成签到,获得积分20
27秒前
朴实的懿轩完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
taotao发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
liuliu发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
29秒前
柠栀完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
善良的樱完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
小马发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Mathematical models in hydrology 1000
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Oncology Clinical Trials: Successful Design, Conduct, and Analysis, Second Edition 800
Erzählte Gnade 500
Butadiene hydroxytelechelic oligomers PBHT 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8083664
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9498588
关于积分的说明 21407888
捐赠科研通 7652029
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3402347
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2531311
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2440944