医学
造血细胞
移植
骨髓增生异常综合症
肿瘤科
内科学
造血干细胞移植
外科
造血
干细胞
骨髓
遗传学
生物
作者
Noureddine Loukili,Luuk Gras,Linda Köster,Didier Blaise,Tobias Gedde‐Dahl,Johan Maertens,Lone Smidstrup Friis,Stephan Mielke,Patrice Chevallier,Jakob Passweg,Jenny Byrne,Urpu Salmenniemi,Patrice Céballos,Jérôme Cornillon,Simona Sica,Francesco Onida,Christof Scheid,Carmelo Gurnari,Joanna Drozd‐Sokołowska,Kavita Raj
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41409-025-02682-3
摘要
Abstract Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) is usually used for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), particularly in the elderly or those with comorbidities. The impact of conditioning intensity on patients’ outcome remains controversial with clinicians’ subjective opinion/ experience remaining a major guide in choosing the intensity. Here, we compare RIC versus MAC in a large EBMT retrospective study in MDS patients aged ≥50 years undergoing allo-HCT between 2014 and 2018. Among the 1393 included patients, 922 (66%) were males, and the median age at transplant was 62.8 (50.0–77.9) years. The majority of patients ( n = 884; 64.3%) had MDS with excess blasts. IPSS-R recorded was very low/low ( n = 598, 43%), intermediate ( n = 352, 25%), and high/very high ( n = 443, 32%). Karnofsky index was ≥90 in 916 (69.3%) patients, and HCT-CI ≥ 3 in 292(27.3%) patients. A RIC regimen was used in 1053 (75.5%) patients. Median follow-up was 27.9 months (IQR: 26.4–30.6). Both uni- and multi-variable analyses did not show any significant association between conditioning intensity and outcomes. This study highlights a lack of association between RIC/MAC regimens and outcomes in allo-HCT MDS patients. Our results support the recently published systematic review and meta-analysis, where evidence for using one conditioning regimen over another remains weak.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI