Task Shifting and Task Sharing to Strengthen the Surgical Workforce in Sub‐Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review of the Existing Literature

Abstract Background A major constraint to surgical care delivery in low‐resource settings is inadequate workforce availability. Surgical task shifting (TShifting) and task sharing (TSharing), in which non‐surgeon clinicians (NSCs) are trained to perform select surgical procedures, have been proposed as one solution. However, patterns of safety and efficacy of surgical TShifting/TSharing are not well‐established. This study aims to summarize the current literature and assess clinical outcomes and impact of surgical TShifting/TSharing in sub‐Saharan Africa. Methods A two‐tiered systematic, PRISMA‐adherent literature review of surgical TShifting/TSharing in sub‐Saharan Africa was conducted. Collected data included healthcare settings; types of surgeries performed; attitudes toward NSCs; and categories, training, capacity, clinical outcomes, safety, retention, cost‐effectiveness, and supervision of NSCs. A random effects meta‐analysis of morbidity and mortality rates between NSCs and surgeons was conducted. Results Among the 659 abstracts screened, 31 studies met inclusion criteria and were integrated in the final analysis. Eighteen studies (58%) report on the capacity and aptitude of NSCs, 16 (52%) on clinical outcomes and safety, and seven (23%) on attitudes. NSCs performed 1999 (61%) of 3304 total surgical cases studied. The most common operations reported were hernia repair ( n = 12, 57%), acute abdominal ( n = 12, 57%), and orthopedic procedures ( n = 6, 29%). No differences were found between NSC and surgeon case morbidity [315 (16%) vs. 224 (17%); p > 0.05] and mortality [44 (2.2%) vs. 33 (2.5%); p > 0.05] rates. Conclusion NSCs are increasingly performing surgical tasks in regions of sub‐Saharan Africa deficient in trained surgeons and appear to have non‐inferior safety outcomes in select programs.