背景(考古学)
倦怠
构造(python库)
社会经济地位
幸福
实证研究
政治
社会学
心理学
护理部
工程伦理学
医学
政治学
认识论
人口
工程类
地理
计算机科学
临床心理学
哲学
人口学
考古
法学
心理治疗师
程序设计语言
作者
Tago L. Mharapara,Janine H. Clemons,James Greenslade‐Yeats,Tanya Ewertowska,Nimbus Staniland,Katherine Ravenswood
出处
期刊:Journal of Professions and Organization
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2022-10-01
卷期号:9 (3): 348-363
被引量:1
摘要
Abstract Our integrative review synthesizes and evaluates two decades of empirical research on well-being in the midwifery profession to reveal (1) how researchers have studied midwives’ well-being; (2) key findings of research on midwives’ well-being; (3) underlying assumptions of this research; and (4) limitations of this research. We find that research on midwives’ well-being is disproportionately focused on individual midwives, who are assumed to be largely responsible for their own well-being, and that well-being in the midwifery profession is generally equated with the absence of mental health problems such as burnout, anxiety, and stress. Researchers have largely taken a narrow and instrumental approach to study midwives’ well-being, focusing on work-related antecedents and consequences, and overlooking the influence of nonwork factors embedded in the broader socioeconomic and cultural environment. Drawing on more comprehensive and contextualized well-being frameworks, we propose a research model that (1) expands the well-being construct as it applies to midwives and (2) situates midwives’ well-being in broader social, economic, political, and cultural contexts. Although developed in the midwifery context, our proposed research model can be applied to a host of professions.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI