Are Women Less Likely to Return to Sport Compared to Men Following Hip Arthroscopy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To compare return-to-sport outcomes between females/women/girls and males/men/boys undergoing hip arthroscopy and explore social and structural determinants of health that may influence return to sport. DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Medline, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science from inception to February 2024. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they assessed return to sport after hip arthroscopy and analyzed the influence of sex/gender on return-to-sport outcomes, or reported sex- or gender-stratified return-to-sport rates. DATA SYNTHESIS: We used a random effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios and conducted meta-regressions to compare return-to-sport outcomes between females/women/girls and males/men/boys. RESULTS: Forty-five studies were included, with all pooled results deemed as very low–certainty evidence. Compared to males/men/boys, females/women/girls had inferior return to sport at the same or higher level between 1 and 3 years postoperatively (pooled OR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.81; P = .004), and at any level of sport at >3 years postoperatively (pooled OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.86; P = .014). Sports participation decreased over time, with ~5.5% to 10% lower proportions observed in females/women/girls compared to males/men/boys. The reporting of determinants of returning to sport was minimal, precluding further exploration of their effects. CONCLUSION: Females/women/girls had lower odds of return to sport, especially during longer follow-up periods, than males/men/boys. The lack of reporting of social and structural determinants of health influencing return-to-sport outcomes makes the reasons for this disparity unclear. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(3):193-205. Epub 10 February 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.12813