Lung cancer outcomes in the elderly: potential disparity in screening

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to analyse outcomes of lung cancer in the elderly METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed of patients in the National Cancer Database with NSCLC from 2004 to 2017 grouped into 2 categories: 70–79 years (A) and 80–90 years (B). Patients with multiple malignancies were excluded. Kaplan–Meier curves estimated the overall survival for each age group based on stage. RESULTS In total, 466 051 patients were included. Less-invasive techniques (imaging and cytology) diagnosed cancer as a function of age: 14.6% in A vs 21.3% in B [P < 0.001, standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.175]. Clinical stage IA was least common in B (15%) compared to 17.3% in A (P < 0.001, SMD 0.079). Approximately 83.0% in B did not receive surgery compared to 70.0% in A (P < 0.001, SMD 0.299). Of the 83.0%, 8.0% were considered poor surgical candidates because of age or comorbidities compared with 6.2% in A (P < 0.001, SMD 0.299) For 71.0% in B, surgery was not the first treatment plan compared to 62.0% in A (P < 0.001, SMD 0.299). Survival curves showed worse prognosis for each clinical and pathologic stage for B compared to A. CONCLUSIONS Patients older than 80 years present less frequently as clinical stage IA, are less commonly offered surgical intervention and are more frequently diagnosed using less accurate measures. They also have worse outcomes for each stage compared to younger patients.