加强流行病学观察研究报告
观察研究
医学
检查表
队列研究
流行病学
报告审判综合标准
家庭医学
队列
冲击系数
梅德林
替代医学
心理学
内科学
病理
认知心理学
法学
政治学
作者
Jalal Poorolajal,Zahra Cheraghi,Amin Doosti‐Irani,Shahab Rezaeian
标识
DOI:10.4178/epih/e2011005
摘要
The quality of reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals was in vestigated to indicate to what extent the items in the Strength ening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist are addressed.Six top scientific medical journals with high impact factor were selected including New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Associa tion, Lan cet, British Medical Journal, Archive of Internal Medicine, and Canadian Medical Association Journal.Ten co hort studies published in 2010 were selected randomly from each journal.The percentage of items in the STR OBE checklist that were addressed in each study was investigated.The total percentage of items addressed by these studies was 69.3 (95% confidence interval: 59.6 to 79.0).We concluded that reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals is not clear enough yet.The reporting of other types of observational studies such as casecontrol and crosssectional studies particularly those being published in less prestigious journals expected to be much more imprecise.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI