计算机科学
自然语言处理
计算机辅助教学
人工智能
语言学
数学教育
心理学
多媒体
哲学
出处
期刊:the CALICO Journal
[Equinox Publishing]
日期:2010-09-30
卷期号:28 (1): 99-134
被引量:28
标识
DOI:10.11139/cj.28.1.99-134
摘要
The purpose of this study is to explore the nature of feedback that English as a Second Language (ESL) students received on their writings either from an automated essay scoring (AES) system or from the teacher. The participants were 12 adult ESL students who were attending an intensive English center at a university in Florida. The drafts of the students were analyzed in depth from a case-study perspective. While the document (essay) analysis was the main data collection method, observations and interviews provided crucial information regarding the context in which the students wrote and the nature of each type of feedback they received. The results revealed that the nature of the AES feedback and written teacher feedback (TF) feedback was different from each other. While the written TF was shorter and more focused, the AES feedback was quite long, generic, and redundant. The findings suggested that AES systems are not entirely ready to meet the needs of ESL or English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. The developing companies need to improve the feedback capabilities of the program for nonnative English-speaking students, that is, less redundancy, shorter feedback, simpler language for feedback, and feedback for short/off topic/repetitious essays.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI