A large language model for complex cardiology care

印为红字的 医学 随机对照试验 梅德林 医学物理学 医疗急救 医疗保健 重症监护医学 急症护理 缺少数据 医学诊断 病史 心脏磁共振 考试(生物学) 质量(理念) 英语 质量管理 临床试验 病人护理 诊断试验 急诊医学 初级保健 循证医学 心脏病学 内科学 诊断准确性 心肌梗塞 心脏磁共振成像
作者
Jack W. O’Sullivan,Anil Palepu,Khaled Saab,Wei‐Hung Weng,Daniel K. Amponsah,Evaline Cheng,Yong Cheng,Emily Chu,Yaanik Desai,Aly Elezaby,Muhammad Fazal,Tasmeen Hussain,Sneha S. Jain,Daniel Seung Kim,Roy Lan,Jiwen Li,Wilson Tang,Natalie Tapaskar,Victoria Parikh,Ryan Sandoval
出处
期刊:Nature Medicine [Nature Portfolio]
卷期号:32 (2): 616-623 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41591-025-04190-9
摘要

The scarcity of subspecialist medical expertise poses a considerable challenge for healthcare delivery. This issue is particularly acute in cardiology, where timely, accurate management determines outcomes. We explored the potential of Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE), a large language model-based experimental medical artificial intelligence system, to augment clinical decision-making in this challenging context. We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing large language model-assisted care with the usual care of complex patients suspected of having a genetic cardiomyopathy, and we curated a real-world dataset of complex cases from a subspecialist cardiology practice. Nine participating general cardiologists were provided with access to both clinical text reports and raw diagnostic data-including electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scans and cardiopulmonary exercise testing-and were randomized to manage these cases, either with or without assistance from AMIE. We developed a ten-domain evaluation rubric used by three blinded subspecialists to evaluate the quality of triage, diagnosis and management. In our randomized controlled trial with retrospective patient data, subspecialists favored large language model-assisted responses overall, and for the management plan and diagnostic testing domains, with the remaining domains considered a tie. Overall, subspecialists preferred AMIE-assisted cardiology assessments 46.7% of the time, compared with 32.7% for cardiologists alone (P = 0.02), with 20.6% rated as a tie. Subspecialists also quantified errors, extra and missing content, reasoning and potential bias. Cardiologists alone had more clinically significant errors (24.3% versus 13.1%, P = 0.033) and more missing content (37.4% versus 17.8%, P = 0.0021) than cardiologists assisted by AMIE. Lastly, cardiologists who used AMIE reported that AMIE helped their assessment more than half the time (57.0%) and saved time in 50.5% of cases.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大个应助阔达老五采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
清爽难胜完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
赘婿应助道友且慢采纳,获得20
2秒前
Mojito完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zyy完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
彭本钦关注了科研通微信公众号
2秒前
2秒前
墨氓完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
顾矜应助东方飞星采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
英俊的铭应助FearNothing采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
Lucas应助他叫塞拉囧采纳,获得30
6秒前
科研通AI6.4应助zr采纳,获得10
6秒前
舒适的馒头完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
彭于晏应助炙热的乌冬面采纳,获得20
7秒前
7秒前
莫妮卡卡完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
cwi发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
小马甲应助Lele采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
奥本海草发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
上岸发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
随风发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Angie完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
生动友容发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
汉堡包应助奥本海草采纳,获得10
13秒前
iris完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
CX330发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
西行发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
内視鏡的に摘除しえた十二指腸乳頭部腫瘍の2例 660
On nonlinear stability of contact discontinuities. In: Hyperbolic problems: theory, numerics, applications (Stony Brook, NY, 1994) 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
微电子器件实验教程 400
The Neuroscience of Language 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7678496
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9243770
关于积分的说明 19925520
捐赠科研通 7249408
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3287120
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2444931
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2290335