医学
回廊的
血压
抗高血压药
动态血压
随机对照试验
药品
临床试验
药理学
抵抗性高血压
内科学
作者
Juan Carlos Yugar‐Toledo,Tatiana Palotta Minari,Priscilla Galisteu de Mello,Elizabeth do Espírito Santo Cestário,Tatiane de Azevedo Rubio,Larissa Morete Caieiro da Costa,Louise Buonalumi Tácito Yugar,Luis Gustavo Sedenho‐Prado,Lúcia Helena Bonalume Tácito,Luciana Neves Cosenso‐Martin,André Fattori,Luciana Pellegrini Pisani,José Fernendo Vilela-Martin,Heitor Moreno
摘要
This study compares sequential nephron blockade (SNB) and renin-angiotensin system sequential blockade (RASSB) in patients with resistant hypertension (RHTN), evaluating central systolic pressure, arterial stiffness, pulse pressure (PP) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Seventy-two RHTN patients were randomly assigned to SNB (n = 35, 22 females, 13 males) or RASSB (n = 37, 22 females, 15 males). SNB included multiple diuretics (furosemide, spironolactone, hydrochlorothiazide) to enhance natriuresis and counter intra-renal compensatory mechanisms. RASSB employed stepwise renin-angiotensin system blockade using lisinopril, bisoprolol and losartan, even in patients already on valsartan. Office blood pressure reductions were significant in both groups (P < 0.0001). SNB: systolic blood pressure (SBP) from 174.5 to 127.0 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from 105.3 to 78.11 mmHg. SBP from 178.4 to 134.4 mmHg, DBP from 102.7 to 77.33 mmHg. ABPM confirmed 24-h reductions (P < 0.0001). SNB showed greater PP reduction (Δ = 22.99 vs 15.93 mmHg, P = 0.024) and central systolic pressure reduction (Δ = -10.3 vs -5.1 mmHg, P = 0.036). RASSB produced a pronounced heart rate decrease (Δ = -12.4 beats per minute, P < 0.0001). No treatment-related discontinuations occurred. SNB demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing central SBP and PP, while RASSB more effectively lowered heart rate. These distinct hemodynamic responses support individualized treatment strategies for patients with RHTN. gov identifier: NCT02832973.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI