Differential effect of interventions in patients with prediabetes stratified by a machine learning‐based diabetes progression prediction model

AIM: To investigate whether stratifying participants with prediabetes according to their diabetes progression risks (PR) could affect their responses to interventions. METHODS: We developed a machine learning-based model to predict the 1-year diabetes PR (ML-PR) with the least predictors. The model was developed and internally validated in participants with prediabetes in the Pinggu Study (a prospective population-based survey in suburban Beijing; n = 622). Patients from the Beijing Prediabetes Reversion Program cohort (a multicentre randomized control trial to evaluate the efficacy of lifestyle and/or pioglitazone on prediabetes reversion; n = 1936) were stratified to low-, medium- and high-risk groups using ML-PR. Different effect of four interventions within subgroups on prediabetes reversal and diabetes progression was assessed. RESULTS: Using least predictors including fasting plasma glucose, 2-h postprandial glucose after 75 g glucose administration, glycated haemoglobin, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides, and the ML algorithm XGBoost, ML-PR successfully predicted the 1-year progression of participants with prediabetes in the Pinggu study [internal area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.80 (0.72-0.89)] and Beijing Prediabetes Reversion Program [external area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.80 (0.74-0.86)]. In the high-risk group pioglitazone plus intensive lifestyle therapy significantly reduced diabetes progression by about 50% at year l and the end of the trial in the high-risk group compared with conventional lifestyle therapy with placebo. In the medium- or low-risk group, intensified lifestyle therapy, pioglitazone or their combination did not show any benefit on diabetes progression and prediabetes reversion. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests personalized treatment for prediabetes according to their PR is necessary. ML-PR model with simple clinical variables may facilitate personal treatment strategies in participants with prediabetes.