荟萃分析
心理学
数学教育
计量经济学
经济
医学
内科学
作者
Joshua R. Polanin,Megan Austin,J. Ashley Taylor,Rebecca R. Steingut,Melissa A. Rodgers,Ryan T. Williams
出处
期刊:AERA Open
[SAGE]
日期:2024-01-01
卷期号:10
被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1177/23328584241269866
摘要
We conducted a comprehensive, systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of the BSCS 5E Instructional Model—and its related variants—on science, math, and motivation outcomes. The 5E Instructional Model is a framework for delivering STEM instruction that is based on constructivist learning theory; it has been used throughout the U.S. and other countries, particularly in Turkey. Despite its wide usage, no comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of 5E and related models has yet been conducted. Our search and screening procedures yielded 61 randomized controlled trial studies, estimating 156 effect sizes; 70% of studies met WWC standards with or without reservations. We found that the 5E instructional model resulted in improved science outcomes ( g = 0.82, 95% CI [0.67, 0.97]), but a large amount of heterogeneity requires some caution ( t = 0.56). We explored numerous explanations for the effect heterogeneity and provided practical recommendations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI