微流控
纳米技术
计算机科学
三维细胞培养
药物开发
药物发现
生化工程
计算生物学
药品
细胞培养
生物信息学
生物
医学
工程类
材料科学
药理学
遗传学
作者
Beatriz D. Cardoso,Elisabete M. S. Castanheira,S. Lanceros‐Méndez,Vanessa F. Cardoso
标识
DOI:10.1002/adhm.202202936
摘要
Abstract The clinical translations of drugs and nanomedicines depend on coherent pharmaceutical research based on biologically accurate screening approaches. Since establishing the 2D in vitro cell culture method, the scientific community has improved cell‐based drug screening assays and models. Those advances result in more informative biochemical assays and the development of 3D multicellular models to describe the biological complexity better and enhance the simulation of the in vivo microenvironment. Despite the overall dominance of conventional 2D and 3D cell macroscopic culture methods, they present physicochemical and operational challenges that impair the scale‐up of drug screening by not allowing a high parallelization, multidrug combination, and high‐throughput screening. Their combination and complementarity with microfluidic platforms enable the development of microfluidics‐based cell culture platforms with unequivocal advantages in drug screening and cell therapies. Thus, this review presents an updated and consolidated view of cell culture miniaturization's physical, chemical, and operational considerations in the pharmaceutical research scenario. It clarifies advances in the field using gradient‐based microfluidics, droplet‐based microfluidics, printed‐based microfluidics, digital‐based microfluidics, SlipChip, and paper‐based microfluidics. Finally, it presents a comparative analysis of the performance of cell‐based methods in life research and development to achieve increased precision in the drug screening process.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI