Impact of secondary prevention medical therapies on outcomes of patients suffering from Myocardial Infarction with NonObstructive Coronary Artery disease (MINOCA): A meta-analysis

Aims To assess the impact of secondary prevention medical therapies (statins, ACE-inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB), beta-blockers (BB) and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT)) on outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA). Methods Five adjusted observational studies encompassing 10,546 were included in this meta-analysis. All-cause death was the primary endpoint, while Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were the secondary endpoints. Results After 24 months of follow up, statins (tested in 8093 patients) were associated with a reduced risk of all-cause death (HR 0.60:0.45–0.81, p 〈0,001), while ACE-inhibitors/ARB (on 9666 patients) were not. Aggregate data from two studies (n = 9720, 7719 on beta-blockers, 6423 on DAPT) indicated that beta-blockers and DAPT (median follow-up 34.1 and 15.7 months, respectively) were both associated with a significant reduction of all-cause death (HR0.81:0.66–0.99, p = 0.04, and HR0.73:0.55–0.98, p = 0.03, for beta-blockers and DAPT, respectively). Among the investigated therapies, only ACE-inhibitors/ARBs entailed a reduced risk of MACE (HR0.65:0.44–0.94, p = 0.02, all CI 95%) over 36.5 months (four studies, n = 10,150). None of the investigated therapies was associated with a reduced risk of AMI. Conclusions Data from adjusted observational studies suggest that beta-blockers, statins and DAPT are associated with a survival benefit among MINOCA patients. ACE-inhibitors/ARB entail a reduced risk of MACE while none of the investigated secondary prevention therapies is associated with a reduced risk of AMI. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.