Evaluation of eccentric tooth contact on a semi-adjustable articulator by using an occlusal analysis system

Statement of problem Duplicating mandibular movement with a semi-adjustable articulator has been reported to lack accuracy. However, although previous studies have analyzed articulator movement, few have compared excursive tooth contact on the articulator with tooth contact during actual mandibular movement. Purpose The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the concordance of semi-adjustable articulator contacts with intraoral contacts during eccentric movements by using a T-scan occlusal analysis system. Material and methods Forty-two participants with normal occlusion and without signs of temporomandibular disorder were analyzed for the reproducibility of eccentric tooth contact on a semi-adjustable articulator. Maxillary casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions were mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator with the facebow. The condylar inclination of the articulator was set by using interocclusal records. Three recordings of right and left excursive mandibular movement and protrusive mandibular movement were made in the supine position by using the T-scan v9.1. The same procedure was then performed with the articulator. The results of complete mandibular movement from T-scan measurements were divided into 4 time points for analysis: T0, T1, T2, and T3. The concordance of intraoral and articulator occlusal contacts was evaluated at each point, and the occlusal force for each tooth was compared. Overall concordance and concordance of the working and nonworking sides were also calculated. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyze differences between the concordance of intraoral and articulator contacts according to mandibular movement direction, time, and working and nonworking sides (α=.01). Results For all teeth, concordance between the intraoral and articulator occlusal contacts during excursive mandibular movement was greatest at T0, decreasing at T1 and T2, and increasing at T3. No significant differences were found in the concordance among the right lateral, left lateral, and protrusive excursion (P>.01). The concordance of working side occlusal contacts during lateral excursion was significantly lower at T3 than that at T0 (P<.01). Conclusions When comparing intraoral and articulator contacts during lateral eccentric mandibular movement, concordance was affected by time and working or nonworking side. Reproducibility of initial eccentric tooth contact on a semi-adjustable articulator appeared to be reliable. However, occlusal adjustment of the working side might be required after prosthesis delivery.