体裁分析
计算机科学
语言学
心理学
万维网
自然语言处理
哲学
作者
Willie Wilson,Heath Rose
标识
DOI:10.1177/23294906251322890
摘要
This study compares AI-generated (ChatGPT and Gemini) and human-written business refusal texts. A genre analysis found that AI-generated texts are formulaic and less nuanced than human-written texts. Applying a rating of professional writing quality, inferential statistics revealed no significant difference in scores between Gemini and human-written texts, but revealed ChatGPT as lower. Human assessors identified authorship of AI-generated texts with an accuracy rate of 68.1%, and human-written texts with 86% accuracy. Key concerns for assessors were tone, relationship, language choice, content, and structure. The findings inform four key areas of focus for teaching business writing in the AI age.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI