Improved Blue Carba test and Carba NP test for detection and classification of major Class A and B carbapenemases, including dual producers, among Gram-negative bacilli

亚胺培南 微生物学 生物 杆菌 碳青霉烯 限制 抗生素 细菌 抗生素耐药性 遗传学 机械工程 工程类
作者
Lucía Maccari,Paola Ceriana,Hugo Granchetti,Antonella Viviana Pezzaniti,Celeste Lucero,Melina Rapoport,Alejandra Menocal,Alejandra Corso,Fernando Pasterán
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Microbiology [American Society for Microbiology]
标识
DOI:10.1128/jcm.01255-23
摘要

ABSTRACT Prompt and precise identification of carbapenemase-producing organisms is crucial for guiding clinical antibiotic treatments and limiting transmission. Here, we propose modifying the Blue Carba test (BCT) and Carba NP-direct (CNPd) to identify molecular carbapenemase classes, including dual carbapenemase strains, by adding specific Class A and Class B inhibitors. We tested 171 carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli strains—21 in Class A (KPC, NMC, SME), 58 in Class B (IMP, VIM, NDM, SPM), and 92 with dual carbapenemase production (KPC+NDM, KPC+IMP, KPC+VIM), all previously positive with BCT or CNPd. We also included 13 carbapenemase non-producers. β-lactamases were previously characterized by PCR. The improved BCT/CNPd methods detect imipenem hydrolysis from an imipenem-cilastatin solution, using pH indicators and Class A (avibactam) and/or Class B (EDTA) inhibitors. Results were interpreted visually based on color changes. CNPd achieved 99.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity in categorizing carbapenemases, while BCT had 91.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Performance varied by carbapenemase classes: both tests classified all Class A-producing strains. For Class B, the CNP test identified 57/58 strains (98.3%), whereas the BCT test, 45/58 strains (77.6%), with non-fermenters posing the greatest detection challenge. For Classes A plus B dual producers, both tests performed exceptionally well, with only one indeterminate strain for the BCT. The statistical comparison showed both methods had similar times to a positive result, with differences based on the carbapenemase class or bacterial group involved. This improved assay rapidly distinguishes major Class A or Class B carbapenemase producers among Gram-negative bacilli, including dual-class combinations, in less than 2 hours. IMPORTANCE Rapid and accurate identification of carbapenemase-producing organisms is of vital importance in guiding appropriate clinical antibiotic treatments and curbing their transmission. The emergence of negative bacilli carrying multiple carbapenemase combinations during and after the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has posed a challenge to the conventional biochemical tests typically used to determine the specific carbapenemase type in the isolated strains. Several initiatives have aimed to enhance colorimetric methods, enabling them to independently identify the presence of Class A or Class B carbapenemases. Notably, no previous efforts have been made to distinguish both classes simultaneously. Additionally, these modifications have struggled to differentiate between carriers of multiple carbapenemases, a common occurrence in many Latin American countries. In this study, we introduced specific Class A and Class B carbapenemase inhibitors into the Blue Carba test (BCT) and Carba NP-direct (CNP) colorimetric assays to identify the type of carbapenemase, even in cases of multiple carbapenemase producers within these classes. These updated assays demonstrated exceptional sensitivity and specificity (≥ 90%) all within a rapid turnaround time of under 2 hours, typically completed in just 45 minutes. These in-house enhancements to the BCT and CNP assays present a rapid, straightforward, and cost-effective approach to determining the primary carbapenemase classes. They could serve as a viable alternative to molecular biology or immuno-chromatography techniques, acting as an initial diagnostic step in the process.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
甜橘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
一一发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
mingjie完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
ding应助spark采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
fan发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
小马甲应助淘气宇采纳,获得10
5秒前
鲜于元珊完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
打打应助1L聚合釜采纳,获得10
9秒前
kenny完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
充电宝应助甜橘采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
Lucas应助zyc采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
田様应助guilin采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
风中亦玉发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
华仔应助思思采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
兴奋迎彤完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
所爱皆在发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
聂课朝发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
coyingkk发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
刘佳玮发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
浮浮发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
寄草发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
坦率依玉发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
聂课朝完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
一一完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Development Across Adulthood 1000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 660
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6449301
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8262101
关于积分的说明 17602149
捐赠科研通 5512585
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2902915
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1880057
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1721332