核型
细胞遗传学
生物
肿瘤科
内科学
染色体
遗传学
医学
基因
作者
Florence Nguyen‐Khac,Audrey Bidet,Agnès Daudignon,Mårina Lafage‐Pochitaloff,Geneviève Ameye,C Bilhou-Nabéra,Élise Chapiro,Marie‐Agnès Collonge‐Rame,Wendy Cuccuini,Nathalie Douet‐Guilbert,Virginie Éclache,Isabelle Luquet,Lucienne Michaux,Nathalie Nadal,Dominique Penther,Benoît Quilichini,Christine Terré,Christine Lefebvre,Marie‐Bérengère Troadec,Lauren Véronèse
出处
期刊:Leukemia
[Springer Nature]
日期:2022-04-16
卷期号:36 (6): 1451-1466
被引量:26
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41375-022-01561-w
摘要
Karyotype complexity has major prognostic value in many malignancies. There is no consensus on the definition of a complex karyotype, and the prognostic impact of karyotype complexity differs from one disease to another. Due to the importance of the complex karyotype in the prognosis and treatment of several hematological diseases, the Francophone Group of Hematological Cytogenetics (Groupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique, GFCH) has developed an up-to-date, practical document for helping cytogeneticists to assess complex karyotypes in these hematological disorders. The evaluation of karyotype complexity is challenging, and it would be useful to have a consensus method for counting the number of chromosomal abnormalities (CAs). Although it is not possible to establish a single prognostic threshold for the number of CAs in all malignancies, a specific consensus prognostic cut-off must be defined for each individual disease. In order to standardize current cytogenetic practices and apply a single denomination, we suggest defining a low complex karyotype as having 3 CAs, an intermediate complex karyotype as having 4 CAs, and a highly complex karyotype as having 5 or more CAs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI