模棱两可
多样性(政治)
施工现场安全
毒物控制
安全文化
职业安全与健康
人为因素与人体工程学
安全行为
风险分析(工程)
知识管理
伤害预防
工作场所安全
系统回顾
工程类
管理科学
自杀预防
多样性(控制论)
计算机科学
应用心理学
工程伦理学
系统安全
概念框架
施工管理
质量(理念)
心理学
安全管理体系
风险管理
作者
Casper Pilskog Orvik,Eirik Albrechtsen,Trond Kongsvik,Siri Mariane Holen,Lene Bertheussen,Stine Thordarson Moltubakk
出处
期刊:Safety Science
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2025-10-22
卷期号:193: 107025-107025
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2025.107025
摘要
• Four main typologies of safety performance conceptualizations: absence of undesirable events (loss-based), effectiveness of safety management systems, individual behaviors and collective practices, and mixed • The heterogeneity and lack of clear definitions contribute to ambiguity in construction safety research, posing challenges for communication and theory development. • The study reviews 231 scientific articles to identify different ways of defining, applying, and measuring safety performance in construction safety research. • Despite the ambiguity, the diversity of conceptualizations offers a broader range of measures for practitioners, emphasizing the need for awareness of these variations for effective communication and application. Safety performance is a critical concept in safety management and research across the construction industry. Effective safety management relies on an understanding of past, present, and expected performance to inform decision-making. Despite extensive research and practical applications in the construction industry, there is no consensus regarding how to conceptualize and measure safety performance. This study reviews 231 scientific articles to explore different definitions, applications, and measurements of safety performance in construction safety research. The findings reveal four main categories of safety performance concepts: loss-based, safety management-based, behavior-based, and mixed approaches. The lack of clear definitions and the heterogeneity of conceptualizations contribute to ambiguity in safety research, posing challenges for communication and theory development. However, this diversity also offers a broader range of measures for practitioners. Awareness of these variations is crucial for the effective communication and application of safety performance metrics in both research and practice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI