作者
Lele Yang,Wei Zhu,Xiaobo Zhang,Xin Zhou,Wei Wu,Tao Shen
摘要
Berberine has been widely used for the adjuvant therapy of several cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, evidence for its efficacy remains controversial.This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of berberine in CVDs.A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).We searched ten electronic databases for articles from inception to December 23, 2022. RCTs comparing berberine alone or combined with statins versus statins or routine for CVDs were included. Meta-analysis was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook.Forty-four RCTs were included with 4606 patients. There were no differences between berberine alone and routine or statins in improving total cholesterol (TC) (SMD, 0.43; 95% CI, -0.39 to 1.24; p = 0.30; I2 = 95%), triglyceride (TG) (SMD, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.49 to 0.21; p = 0.44; I2 = 76%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (SMD, 0.69; 95% CI, -0.23 to 1.60; p = 0.14; I2 = 96%), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (SMD, 0.55; 95% CI, -0.48 to 1.57; p = 0.30; I2 = 96%), and Crouse score levels. Berberine alone significantly reduced National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and intima-media thickness (IMT) levels than routine therapy. Berberine plus statins significantly reduced TC, TG, LDL-C, NIHSS score, hs-CRP, TNF-α, IMT, Crouse score, and number of unstable plaques levels than routine or statins. However, no differences were found between groups in improving HDL-C and IL-6 levels. There were no significant differences between groups in the incidence of adverse reactions.This study suggests that berberine may be a promising alternative for CVDs with no serious adverse reactions. However, our results may be limited by the quality of existing research. High-quality RCTs are needed to provide more convinced evidence.