sCARy! Risk Perceptions in Autonomous Driving: The Influence of Experience on Perceived Benefits and Barriers

风险感知 感知 心理学 应用心理学 社会心理学 环境卫生 医学 神经科学
作者
Teresa Brell,Ralf Philipsen,Martina Ziefle
出处
期刊:Risk Analysis [Wiley]
卷期号:39 (2): 342-357 被引量:121
标识
DOI:10.1111/risa.13190
摘要

The increasing development of autonomous vehicles (AVs) influences the future of transportation. Beyond the potential benefits in terms of safety, efficiency, and comfort, also potential risks of novel driving technologies need to be addressed. In this article, we explore risk perceptions toward connected and autonomous driving in comparison to conventional driving. In order to gain a deeper understanding of individual risk perceptions, we adopted a two-step empirical procedure. First, focus groups ( N=17 ) were carried out to identify relevant risk factors for autonomous and connected driving. Further, a questionnaire was developed, which was answered by 516 German participants. In the questionnaire, three driving technologies (connected, autonomous, conventional) were evaluated via semantic differential (rating scale to identify connotative meaning of technologies). Second, participants rated perceived risk levels (for data, traffic environment, vehicle, and passenger) and perceived benefits and barriers of connected/autonomous driving. Since previous experience with automated functions of driver assistance systems can have an impact on the evaluation, three experience groups have been formed. The effect of experience on benefits and barrier perceptions was also analyzed. Risk perceptions were significantly smaller for conventional driving compared to connected/autonomous driving. With increasing experience, risk perception decreases for novel driving technologies with one exception: the perceived risk in handling data is not influenced by experience. The findings contribute to an understanding of risk perception in autonomous driving, which helps to foster a successful implementation of AVs on the market and to develop public information strategies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zxt发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
明亮青梦完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
5秒前
10秒前
安详砖家完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
浮游应助梅天豪采纳,获得10
13秒前
cabbage完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
MrIShelter发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
cappuccino完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
小灰灰完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
酷炫的__完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
木木完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Lidanni完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
Hola发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
huhdcid发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
mzk关注了科研通微信公众号
20秒前
华仔应助嘻嘻采纳,获得10
22秒前
姚芭蕉完成签到 ,获得积分0
22秒前
华仔应助zxt采纳,获得10
23秒前
哈基米德应助kyouu采纳,获得20
23秒前
YY完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
云泥完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
打打应助纯真凌晴采纳,获得10
24秒前
26秒前
27秒前
脆脆鲨完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
整齐芷文完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
HHHHH完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
32秒前
SciGPT应助ZZZ采纳,获得10
32秒前
jignjing完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
菲噗噗发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
34秒前
34秒前
36秒前
SilverGhost发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
42秒前
蒋好完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
43秒前
高分求助中
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Third edition 2025 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Beyond the sentence : discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5339044
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4475985
关于积分的说明 13930102
捐赠科研通 4371418
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2401804
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1394843
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1366677