多样性(政治)
团队合作
背景(考古学)
多样性(控制论)
工程教育
文化多样性
机构
心理学
人口统计学的
高等教育
班级(哲学)
工程类
数学教育
教育学
社会学
工程管理
管理
政治学
计算机科学
社会科学
人类学
人口学
古生物学
人工智能
经济
法学
生物
作者
Linda Steuer Dankert,Shannon Gilmartin,Carol B. Muller,Carolin Dungs,Sheri Sheppard,Carmen Leicht-Scholten
出处
期刊:International Journal of Engineering Education
[Tempus Publications]
日期:2019-01-01
卷期号:35 (2): 658-673
被引量:7
摘要
Given changing demographics among engineers and engineering students, increasing international teamwork, andgrowing awareness of the ways in which cultural and cognitive biases may impinge on engineering problem-solving toreach optimal solutions,can a course providing an opportunity to learn about culture and diversity benefit engineers’ training?In 2015, the inaugural Expanding Engineering Limits course was offered to undergraduate and graduate students as atransnational course between Stanford University in the United States and RWTH Aachen University in Germany. Thecourse was designed to introduce students to a variety of terms, concepts, and paradigms that could deepen theirunderstanding of culture and diversity in engineering education and practice. In addition to classroom lectures, studentsfrom both RWTH Aachen University and Stanford University participated in a Design Thinking course developed by thetwo teams and realized at Stanford’s Hasso Plattner Institute of Design and worked on group projects throughout theacademic term, examining organizational and cultural change in transnational teams. Instructors employed severalqualitative and quantitative course evaluation methods, including pre- and post-surveys to measure student change in keyattitudinal domains, short in-class reflections and questionnaires to solicit student feedback, institution-level courseevaluation forms, and data from students’ final projects. Overall, results from these evaluation techniques indicated thatthe course informed students’ thinking and knowledge about the importance of diversity and culture in engineering.Students saw the experiences of working together in a transnational project team as very beneficial for the understanding ofcultures and diversity in a professional context. Evaluation findings suggest that the course’s intended goals were met to asubstantial degree. We propose that a course-based experience such as this onecanbenefit an engineer’s training, and sharerecommendations and ‘‘lessons learned’’ for engineering educators and leaders.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI