医学
骨科手术
子群分析
矢状面
外科
颈椎病
可视模拟标度
颈椎
射线照相术
放射科
内科学
置信区间
病理
替代医学
作者
Xiuru Zhang,Kun Gao,Huiqi Xie,Yanzheng Gao
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.017
摘要
To explore the appropriate range of C0-C2 correction angles by analyzing cervical sagittal alignment parameters and evaluating clinical outcomes.The preoperative and postoperative radiographs, visual analogue scale, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and neck disability index of 65 atlantoaxial dislocation patients were retrospectively collected. The C0-C2 angle, C2-C7 angle, and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) were measured from the radiographs, and an assessment of cervical degenerative disc disease was made. According to the 2-year postoperative C0-C2 angles, all patients were categorized into a <10° subgroup, 10°-20° subgroup, and >20° subgroups.The postoperative C2-C7 angles and cSVA of the 10°-20° subgroup were significantly different from those of the <10° subgroup. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score of the 10°-20° subgroup was significantly different from those of the <10° and >20° subgroups. All patients (26/26) in the 10°-20° subgroup exhibited a cSVA 0-40 mm, 25% of patients (6/24) in the >20° subgroup exhibited a cSVA >40 mm, and 40% of patients (6/15) in the <10° subgroup showed a cSVA <0 mm. The postoperative incidence of cervical degenerative disc disease did not increase in the 10°-20° subgroup.Atlantoaxial dislocation patients with different C0-C2 postoperative angles had different cervical sagittal alignments and clinical outcomes. In our study, the patients within the C0-C2 10°-20° subgroup exhibited superior clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI