Applying 3D-Printed Templates in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervix Cancer: Simplified Needle Insertion for Optimized Dosimetry

Purpose In cervical cancer brachytherapy, adding interstitial needles to intracavitary applicators can enhance dosimetry by improving target coverage while limiting normal tissue dose. However, its use is limited to a subset of practitioners with appropriate technical skill. We designed tandem anchored radially guiding interstitial templates (TARGITs) with a 3-dimensional (3D) printing workflow to optimize needle placement and facilitate greater ease-of-use of intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS) technique. This study compared dosimetry and procedure characteristics between tandem and ovoid (T&O) implants using TARGIT technique versus non-TARGIT technique. Methods and Materials This single-institution retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing T&O brachytherapy as part of definitive radiation treatment for cervical cancer between February 2017 and January 2021. TARGIT technique was implemented from November 2019 onwards; all prior procedures involved non-TARGIT technique using a no needle or freehand needle approach. Target coverage, dose to organs at risk, and procedure times were evaluated and compared between TARGIT technique and non-TARGIT technique. Results The cohort included 70 patients with cervical cancer who underwent 302 T&O procedures: 68 (23%) with TARGIT technique and 234 (77%) with non-TARGIT technique, which included 133 no needle and 101 freehand needle implants. TARGIT implants involved longer average procedure times (+6.3 minutes, P < .0001). TARGIT implants achieved a higher mean high-risk clinical target volume V100% than non-TARGIT implants (+4.4%, P = .001), including for large tumors 30 cm3 or greater (+8.1%, P = .002). Average D90 was 4.6 Gy higher and average D98 was 3.2 Gy higher for TARGIT technique compared with non-TARGIT technique (P = .006 and P = .02). Total treatment doses to rectum, bowel, and bladder were not significantly different for TARGIT versus non-TARGIT technique. Conclusions The 3D-printed TARGIT approach to T&O brachytherapy achieved greater tumor coverage while sparing normal tissues, particularly for large tumor volumes, with only a slight increase in average procedure time. TARGIT represents a creative technological solution for increasing accessibility of advanced IC/IS brachytherapy technique for cervical cancer definitive radiation treatment. In cervical cancer brachytherapy, adding interstitial needles to intracavitary applicators can enhance dosimetry by improving target coverage while limiting normal tissue dose. However, its use is limited to a subset of practitioners with appropriate technical skill. We designed tandem anchored radially guiding interstitial templates (TARGITs) with a 3-dimensional (3D) printing workflow to optimize needle placement and facilitate greater ease-of-use of intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS) technique. This study compared dosimetry and procedure characteristics between tandem and ovoid (T&O) implants using TARGIT technique versus non-TARGIT technique. This single-institution retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing T&O brachytherapy as part of definitive radiation treatment for cervical cancer between February 2017 and January 2021. TARGIT technique was implemented from November 2019 onwards; all prior procedures involved non-TARGIT technique using a no needle or freehand needle approach. Target coverage, dose to organs at risk, and procedure times were evaluated and compared between TARGIT technique and non-TARGIT technique. The cohort included 70 patients with cervical cancer who underwent 302 T&O procedures: 68 (23%) with TARGIT technique and 234 (77%) with non-TARGIT technique, which included 133 no needle and 101 freehand needle implants. TARGIT implants involved longer average procedure times (+6.3 minutes, P < .0001). TARGIT implants achieved a higher mean high-risk clinical target volume V100% than non-TARGIT implants (+4.4%, P = .001), including for large tumors 30 cm3 or greater (+8.1%, P = .002). Average D90 was 4.6 Gy higher and average D98 was 3.2 Gy higher for TARGIT technique compared with non-TARGIT technique (P = .006 and P = .02). Total treatment doses to rectum, bowel, and bladder were not significantly different for TARGIT versus non-TARGIT technique. The 3D-printed TARGIT approach to T&O brachytherapy achieved greater tumor coverage while sparing normal tissues, particularly for large tumor volumes, with only a slight increase in average procedure time. TARGIT represents a creative technological solution for increasing accessibility of advanced IC/IS brachytherapy technique for cervical cancer definitive radiation treatment.