Depending on Experience.

作者
Stefinee Pinnegar
出处
期刊:Educational research quarterly 卷期号:21 (2): 43-59 被引量:5
链接
摘要

Depends is frequently one of the first answers teachers give when questioned about their decisions based on their teaching experiences. An understanding and acceptance of the contingent nature of the work of teaching is basic to development in the process of becoming a teacher. As a teacher educator, I know that the development of my students as teachers depends on experience and yet this is one aspect of teacher education over which we frequently have little control. My purpose in this paper is to explore this contingency more completely and examine how attention to it holds the most promise for teacher education reform. Clandinin and Connelly (1991) and Goodson (1992) among others have explored the use of narrative in conducting research on teaching. My stance in this examination is a narrative one. But instead of examining the possibility of researchers doing research on experience in becoming a teacher from a narrative framework, I attend instead to understandings of experience and narrative which could lead to reconceptualizing teacher education processes. Polkinghorne's (1988) conception of the three levels of narrative (living, telling, and interpreting the experience) is central to this analysis. WHAT COUNTS AS EXPERIENCE? There are two ways in which teacher education ignores what might count as experience in the education of our students: past experience and borrowed experience. Past experience. When students enter teacher education programs, we often treat them as if they come to us as blank slates. We usually do not utilize in systematic, functional ways the experiences they bring with them. Experiences in teaching peers or siblings, in performing in front of audiences as actors or musicians, in grading papers for another teacher, in teaching in religious settings, in managing rowdy teen-age boys:at a local video-arcade, in door to door selling or in myriad and contingent experiences that will inform their decisions and choices as a teacher are accepted as standard but are often ignored by teacher education programs. It is not enough merely to be aware that such experience exists because it has fundamentally marked our students. Bullough, Knowles, & Crowe (1991) have documented the importance of personal history and the complexity of students' conceptions of teaching for their success in beginning teaching. As a result of this work, many teacher education programs, I assume, now use personal history assignments or tasks in some part of their program. But I wonder if we attend carefully enough to the dynamic quality of past experience when it is embraced as part of the learning to teach process. Ben-Peretz (1995) has argued that the wisdom of practice relies on past experience. Teachers' work, she suggests, is a chain of routine and unexpected events coupled together and that this is the raw data from which teachers form generic images which guide their practice. In their practice, teachers create a living educational theory--their theories of practice are embodied in that practice (Whitehead, 1989). Ever present in the current practice of a teacher are the past experiences and the conclusions, assumptions, conceptions of teaching and learning which are built upon past experience and which are evident in current experience. We often deny this dynamic quality and primacy of prior experience-- not our own but that of the student who is becoming a teacher. HoltReynolds (199 AERA article and AERA presentation??) work documents clearly the impact of students' past experience on what they will learn from us. She argues that students in our classes can do the tasks we require, brilliantly and comprehensively, but until what we teach connects with the self-as-learner or the beginning self-as-teacher, our students do not incorporate what they are learning. No matter how competently they can perform a skill or exhibit a particular disposition which we require, when they leave us it will most likely drop from their repertoire unless there is a place in their understanding of experience (what it will be like as they become a teacher) to which it can connect. …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI6.4应助林小鱼采纳,获得10
刚刚
自然的世平完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
丰富语蕊应助撒西不理采纳,获得10
2秒前
zzzz驳回了ale应助
2秒前
li发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
ixi完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
快乐冷风完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
科研小白发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Wang完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
cqsuper完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
seeya发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
芒果Mango完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
senli2018发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
苏博儿完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
狂野吐司完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
小二郎应助天天天才采纳,获得10
11秒前
复杂的果汁应助菠誒貝采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
思思发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
哦哦哦发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
小小黑完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
OK应助Peng采纳,获得200
17秒前
顺顺过过发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
无w完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
Fawkes完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
wyx完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
白茶完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
朝乾夕惕完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
23秒前
张大星完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
luobin完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
26秒前
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 5000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Evidence Summary. Injection (subcutaneous):op- timal administration 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7495064
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9086231
关于积分的说明 19379525
捐赠科研通 7106595
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3249820
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2419180
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2235551