Effect of Vigileo/FloTrac System-Guided Aggressive Hydration in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients to Prevent Contrast-Induced Nephropathy After Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Tailored hydration strategies appear to provide an effective solution for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The Vigileo/FloTrac system could predict the patients’ fluid responsiveness and tolerance to hydration. This prospective multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label study evaluated the efficacy of aggressive hydration guided by the Vigileo/FloTrac system for CIN prevention in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This trial enrolled patients with AMI undergoing urgent PCI, and these patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either aggressive hydration guided by Vigileo/FloTrac system (intervention group) or general hydration (control group). Patients with AMI in the intervention group received a loading dose of saline, and the hydration speed was adjusted according to the change of Vigileo/FloTrac index. The primary end point is CIN, which was defined as a >25% or >0.5 mg/100 ml increase in serum creatinine compared with baseline during the first 72 hours after urgent PCI. This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04382313). A total of 344 patients with AMI were enrolled and randomized in our trial, and the baseline characteristics, including risk factors of CIN, of the Vigileo/FloTrac-guided hydration group (n = 173) and control group (n = 171) were well balanced (all p >0.05). The total hydration volume in Vigileo/FloTrac-guided hydration group was significantly much more than control group (1,910 ± 600 vs 440 ± 90 ml, p <0.001). The incidence of CIN in the Vigileo/FloTrac-guided hydration group was significantly decreased than that in the control group (12.1% [21/173] vs 22.2% [38/171], p = 0.013). There was not significantly different in the incidence of acute heart failure after PCI (9.2% [16/173] vs 7.6% [13/171], p = 0.583). The incidence of main adverse cardiovascular events in the Vigileo/FloTrac-guided hydration group was lower than that in the control group but without statistically difference (30 events [17.3%] vs 38 events [22.2%], p = 0.256). In conclusion, Vigileo/FloTrac system-guided aggressive hydration could effectively decrease the risk of CIN for patients with AMI undergoing urgent PCI and avoid attack of acute heart failure at the same time. Tailored hydration strategies appear to provide an effective solution for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The Vigileo/FloTrac system could predict the patients’ fluid responsiveness and tolerance to hydration. This prospective multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label study evaluated the efficacy of aggressive hydration guided by the Vigileo/FloTrac system for CIN prevention in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This trial enrolled patients with AMI undergoing urgent PCI, and these patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either aggressive hydration guided by Vigileo/FloTrac system (intervention group) or general hydration (control group). Patients with AMI in the intervention group received a loading dose of saline, and the hydration speed was adjusted according to the change of Vigileo/FloTrac index. The primary end point is CIN, which was defined as a >25% or >0.5 mg/100 ml increase in serum creatinine compared with baseline during the first 72 hours after urgent PCI. This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04382313). A total of 344 patients with AMI were enrolled and randomized in our trial, and the baseline characteristics, including risk factors of CIN, of the Vigileo/FloTrac-guided hydration group (n = 173) and control group (n = 171) were well balanced (all p >0.05). The total hydration volume in Vigileo/FloTrac-guided hydration group was significantly much more than control group (1,910 ± 600 vs 440 ± 90 ml, p <0.001). The incidence of CIN in the Vigileo/FloTrac-guided hydration group was significantly decreased than that in the control group (12.1% [21/173] vs 22.2% [38/171], p = 0.013). There was not significantly different in the incidence of acute heart failure after PCI (9.2% [16/173] vs 7.6% [13/171], p = 0.583). The incidence of main adverse cardiovascular events in the Vigileo/FloTrac-guided hydration group was lower than that in the control group but without statistically difference (30 events [17.3%] vs 38 events [22.2%], p = 0.256). In conclusion, Vigileo/FloTrac system-guided aggressive hydration could effectively decrease the risk of CIN for patients with AMI undergoing urgent PCI and avoid attack of acute heart failure at the same time.