Conformal coating of macroscopic nanoparticle compacts with ZnO via atomic layer deposition

Conformal atomic layer deposition (ALD) inside macroscopic nanoporous solids with aspect ratios greater than 103 can require ALD reactant exposures on the order of 103 Torr-s or greater. For some ALD chemistries, such large exposures raise the concern of non-self-limiting deposition. In the case of ZnO ALD from diethylzinc (DEZ) and H2O, exposures in the 10–103 Torr-s range have resulted in metallic Zn deposition at typical temperatures used for ZnO ALD on wafers (e.g., ∼180 °C). This Zn deposition can be suppressed by lowering the deposition temperature, but this slows H2O desorption and, thus, can necessitate impractically long purge times. In this work, we use static-dose ALD with DEZ and H2O exposures >104 Torr-s to deposit ZnO inside Al2O3 nanoparticle compacts (NPCs) with 50.5 ± 0.3% porosity, 100 nm NP diameter, 1.55 ± 0.05 mm thickness, and an aspect ratio of 7800 ± 200 (based on the half-thickness), and we explore a novel approach to the deposition temperature, T: T is cycled between 160 °C (for H2O purges) and 120 °C (for all other steps). For comparison, we also deposit ZnO with T held constant at 120 or 160 °C. Whereas the T = 160 °C process results in Zn metal deposition and nonuniform infiltration, the temperature-cycled process yields apparently self-limiting ZnO deposition at a growth per cycle (GPC) of ∼2.1 Å/cyc, forming an electrically conductive ZnO network that is uniform throughout the thickness of the NPC, with the exception of some ZnO depletion near the NPC surfaces, possibly due to the (unoptimized) long DEZ purge time. The T = 120 °C process produces similar results, although the GPC is slightly elevated, indicating diminished removal of H2O and/or OH during purges. We employ scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, x-ray diffractometry, electrical resistivity measurements, and ALD chamber pressure analysis in our comparison of the three ALD processes.