转换器
电容器
电压
电子工程
去耦电容器
控制(管理)
电气工程
控制理论(社会学)
计算机科学
工程类
人工智能
作者
Chaochao Song,Ning Wang,Ariya Sangwongwanich,Yongheng Yang,Frede Blaabjerg
标识
DOI:10.1109/tpel.2024.3454961
摘要
Dual-active-bridge (DAB) converter with multilevel neutral-point-clamped (NPC) topology has shown potential to be a viable solution for medium-voltage DC (MVDC) systems. However, it will face a crucial challenge with regard to capacitor voltage balancing. In order to mitigate the negative effects caused by the voltage imbalance, e.g., overvoltage on certain devices, various control strategies for voltage balancing have been developed. To better design and implement the voltage balancing strategies, this paper evaluates several voltage balancing approaches, i.e., modified-duty-cycle (MDC) method, modified-phase-shift-and-duty-cycle (MPSDC) method, fixed-switching-state (FSS) method, and complementary-switching-state (CSS) method. These voltage balancing approaches have distinct characteristics in terms of dynamics, efficiency, robustness, applicability with modulation strategy, and implementation complexity. Evaluation results show that the MDC and MPSDC methods have advantage of extending to various control strategies. However, they are affected by current polarity identification, and have large current and power fluctuations. The FSS method is the most robust and the simplest one, but it also has poor dynamics. On the other hand, the CSS method can deliver smooth dynamics and high efficiency, but it relies on identifying the polarity of inductor current, and it cannot be used to the single-phase-shift (SPS) and triple-phase-shift (TPS) control strategies. Based on the evaluation results, the suitable applications of different voltage balancing methods are discussed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI