Reducing the risk of transfusion‐transmitted cytomegalovirus infection: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

白细胞减少 医学 荟萃分析 置信区间 相对风险 内科学 巨细胞病毒 子群分析 输血 免疫学 人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV) 病毒性疾病 疱疹病毒科
作者
Maria Mainou,Fares Alahdab,Aaron A.R. Tobian,Noor Asi,Khaled Mohammed,M. Hassan Murad,Brenda J. Grossman
出处
期刊:Transfusion [Wiley]
卷期号:56 (6pt2): 1569-1580 被引量:31
标识
DOI:10.1111/trf.13478
摘要

BACKGROUND Leukoreduced (LR) or cytomegalovirus (CMV)‐seronegative cellular blood components are commonly used to reduce the risk of transfusion‐transmitted CMV infection in high‐risk patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the evidence for the use of LR cellular blood components with or without concurrent CMV testing of donor units in patients undergoing chemotherapy or solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, in pregnant women, in very‐low‐birthweight infants, and in patients with primary immunodeficiency. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus from 1980 through February 2015. Studies were included if they had a comparison group. Two independent reviewers selected and appraised studies. Meta‐analysis was performed when appropriate. RESULTS Of 457 studies screened, 11 were eligible. One study was excluded from the meta‐analysis because the comparison performed differed significantly from the others. Meta‐analysis of five studies that compared leukoreduction to transfusing CMV‐untested blood components showed no significant difference in clinical CMV infection (relative risk [RR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04‐1.57) or laboratory CMV infection (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.08‐1.37). Meta‐analysis of three studies that compared leukoreduction to transfusing CMV‐seronegative cellular components showed no significant difference in laboratory CMV infection (RR, 2.18; 95% CI, 0.96‐4.98). Meta‐analysis of two studies that compared adding CMV testing to leukoreduction (vs. leukoreduction alone) showed no significant difference in clinical or laboratory CMV infection. The certainty in estimates was low for all comparisons. CONCLUSION At present, the scientific evidence does not favor a single strategy for reducing the risk of transfusion‐related CMV infection in high‐risk patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
斯文败类应助XS_QI采纳,获得10
1秒前
FashionBoy应助快乐一江采纳,获得10
2秒前
鼻骨骨折发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
cjl0413完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
KT酱发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
少堂完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
yyc666发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
lalala发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
BBC发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
fighting发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
阔达立轩完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
顾矜应助yyc666采纳,获得10
9秒前
高高海安发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Jery完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
认真秋完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
烟花应助BBC采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
科研通AI5应助TU采纳,获得10
19秒前
zhiwei完成签到 ,获得积分0
19秒前
duanqianqian发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
MissDZ完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
Orange应助fighting采纳,获得10
22秒前
情怀应助Arrow采纳,获得30
23秒前
凌枫修完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
温暖听安完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
29秒前
31秒前
wuhu关注了科研通微信公众号
31秒前
不配.应助雪落你看不见采纳,获得10
32秒前
清欢应助久安采纳,获得10
32秒前
33秒前
34秒前
34秒前
duanqianqian完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
lay完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
快乐一江发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
852应助自信机器猫采纳,获得10
36秒前
37秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Voyage au bout de la révolution: de Pékin à Sochaux 700
First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies, 2nd Edition 500
Assessment of adverse effects of Alzheimer's disease medications: Analysis of notifications to Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers in Northwest France 400
The Secrets of Successful Product Launches 300
The Rise & Fall of Classical Legal Thought 260
The Effects of Valsartan and Amlodipine on the Levels of Irisin, Adropin, and Perilipin 200
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4337157
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3847178
关于积分的说明 12015391
捐赠科研通 3487963
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1914486
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 957407
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 857845