[Mismatch repair protein expression of colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis of 3 428 cases].

Objective: To analyze the expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in colorectal cancers (CRC) and to evaluate the feasibility and potential pitfalls of immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis for MMR. Methods: The IHC sections for MMR proteins were reviewed in 3 428 cases of resected CRC without neoadjuvant therapy at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from July 2014 to October 2018. For the cases with unclear MMR IHC results during the initial review, IHC staining was repeated and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis was performed. Relationships between the expression of MMR proteins and MSI status as well as the clinicopathological parameters were analyzed. Results: IHC staining for MMR was repeated in 28 (0.8%) cases due to poor quality of original IHC sections. Inconsistent results between the original diagnosis and re-diagnosis were found in 119 (3.5%) cases, mainly resulting from PMS2 and MLH1. Finally, 261 (7.6%) cases of CRC showed mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), mainly from the deficiency of both MLH1 and PMS2 (43.3%,113/261). In the 14 cases with MSI results, the concordant of MSI and MMR was 13 cases. In the 29 dMMR cases with next generation sequencing (NGS) results, the concordant of MSI-high and dMMR was 93.1%(27/29). The cases with inconsistent results between MSI and MMR showed negative expression of MSH6 or PMS2. Twenty-one CRC showed negative expression of MLH1 and partially positive (or weak positive) expression of PMS2, or negative expression of MSH2 and partially positive (or weak positive) expression of MSH6. Among the 19 cases with MSI results, 16 cases were MSI-high, two cases were MSI-low, and one case was microsatellite stable. Compared with mismatch repair proficiency (pMMR), dMMR was more frequently detected in female patients younger than 50 years old, with family history, at early stage (Ⅰ-Ⅱ) CRC, and in the tumors from right colon,with poor differentiation, or mucinous adenocarcinoma/signet ring cell carcinoma (all P<0.05). Conclusions: At present, IHC staining is a clinically effective and convenient method to detect MMR expression, but the operating process and result assessment remain variable and need to be standardized. MSI analysis can be performed in the difficult-to-evaluate cases for MMR to enhance prognostic evaluation and treatment option.