磁刺激
经颅直流电刺激
医学
萧条(经济学)
脑卒中后抑郁
荟萃分析
脑刺激
冲程(发动机)
刺激
内科学
物理疗法
物理医学与康复
严格标准化平均差
康复
宏观经济学
经济
工程类
机械工程
作者
Yiting Shen,Zheng-Yun Cai,Furong Liu,Zhihui Zhang,Guang-Xia Ni
出处
期刊:The Neurologist
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2022-02-21
卷期号:27 (4): 177-182
被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1097/nrl.0000000000000416
摘要
Background: Previous studies showed that the application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during stroke rehabilitation improve the depression symptoms in poststroke depression (PSD). However, some studies showed inconsistent results. The study was designed to make a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of noninvasive brain stimulation (tDCS and rTMS) on PSD. Methods: Articles published before July 2021 were searched in databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. STATA 12.0 software was utilized to make meta-analysis. We extracted or calculated mean values and SD of reduction or increase rate of depression-related scales. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as effect size. Results: The study showed increased immediate and long-term improvement in depression in rTMS group compared with sham rTMS group after treatment with random-effects models (immediate: SMD=4.92, 95% CI=2.69-7.15, I 2 =95.2%, P -value for Q test <0.001; long term: SMD=7.21, 95% CI=3.50-10.92, I 2 =93.9%, P -value for Q test <0.001). Meta-analysis showed increased substantially immediate improvement in depression in tDCS group compared with sham tDCS group with a random effect model (SMD=5.30, 95% CI=1.30-9.30, I 2 =97.3%, P- value for Q test <0.001). Conclusions: rTMS and tDCS were demonstrated to be effective and safe treatment techniques for PSD. More large-scale studies were essential to explore the effect of rTMS with different frequencies and tDCS on PSD.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI