医学
基底动脉
随机对照试验
冲程(发动机)
闭塞
血管内治疗
临床试验
神经影像学
放射科
重症监护医学
外科
内科学
动脉瘤
机械工程
精神科
工程类
作者
Rashid Ahmed,Adam A. Dmytriw,Aman B. Patel,Christopher J. Stapleton,Justin E. Vranic,James D. Rabinov,Thabele M Leslie‐Mazwi,Natalia S. Rost,Joshua A Hirsch,Robert W. Regenhardt
标识
DOI:10.1177/15910199221106049
摘要
Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is an infrequent but often fatal subtype of stroke. Predicting outcomes and selecting patients for endovascular therapy (EVT) remains challenging. Advances in neuroimaging and the development of prognostic scoring systems have augmented clinical decision-making over time. Recent randomized trials, BEST (Basilar Artery Occlusion Endovascular Intervention vs. Standard Medical Treatment), BASICS (Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study), BAOCHE (Basilar Artery Occlusion CHinese Endovascular Trial) and ATTENTION (Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion), compared EVT and medical management for patients with BAO. These trials yielded mixed results. The former two suggested unclear benefit while the latter two supported a benefit of EVT. While all had limitations, most providers agree caution should be exercised when excluding patients from EVT who may stand to benefit. Further studies are therefore needed to determine the effectiveness, safety, selection criteria, and optimal technical approach for EVT among patients with BAO. Hyperacute-phase advanced imaging can offer several benefits to aid decision making. It is reasonable to exclude patients with low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), large imaging-proven cores, and evidence of perforator occlusion by branch atheromatous disease. Herein, we review the clinical presentation, imaging work-up, treatments, and clinical outcomes for BAO, while highlighting knowledge gaps in treatment selection and technique.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI